Bug 2187617 - [6.1][rgw-ms] Writing on a bucket with num_shards 0 causes sync issues and rgws to segfault on the replication site.
Summary: [6.1][rgw-ms] Writing on a bucket with num_shards 0 causes sync issues and rg...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW-Multisite
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.1
Assignee: shilpa
QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra
Akash Raj
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2192813
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-18 07:58 UTC by Vidushi Mishra
Modified: 2023-06-15 09:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.6-24.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Segmentation fault no longer occurs when bucket has a `num_shards` value of `0` Previously, multi-site sync would result in segmentation faults when a bucket had `num_shards` value of `0`. This resulted in inconsistent sync behavior and segmentation fault. With this fix, `num_shards=0` is properly represented in data sync and buckets with shard value `0` does not have any issues with syncing.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-15 09:17:21 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github ceph ceph pull 51085 0 None open rgw/multisite: handle shard_id correctly in data sync when bucket num_shards is 0 2023-04-19 14:01:07 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-6476 0 None None None 2023-04-18 07:59:37 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2023:3623 0 None None None 2023-06-15 09:18:16 UTC

Internal Links: 2188022

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2023-06-15 09:17:21 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3623
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.