Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (python-plotnine) Fails To Install in Fedora 37: can't install python3-plotnine+extra: - nothing provides python3.11dist(scikit-misc) needed by python3-plotnine+extra-0.10.1-1.fc37.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-37-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install python3-plotnine+extra P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
It seems the 'Provides: python3.11dist(scikit-misc)' is no longer generated correctly since the switch to the Meson build. python3-scikit-misc-0.4.1 has it: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=33499016 python3-scikit-misc-0.2.0 no longer does. It only has 'python3.11-scikit-misc = 0.2.0-2.fc37': https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=34286026 Not sure on how to handle this. Do I need to add some Python macros to the spec for generating the correct provides? Or do I add these manually? @music any thoughts?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192078#c1
I’m going to try packaging python-meson-python and see if I can get the build working that way.
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3) > I’m going to try packaging python-meson-python and see if I can get the > build working that way. I saw your comment in bug 2192078. Using python-meson-python is probably the cleanest approach. Thanks! Should I add Provides for the time being or just let it mellow for a while?
(In reply to Sandro from comment #4) > I saw your comment in bug 2192078. Using python-meson-python is probably the > cleanest approach. Thanks! Should I add Provides for the time being or just > let it mellow for a while? Hmm. Since adding %py_provides won’t help without proper metadata, and the packaging guidelines really disfavor adding the machine-readable Provides manually (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides), let’s see if we can fix it the “right” way reasonably quickly.
FEDORA-2023-670f0267f5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-670f0267f5
FEDORA-2023-670f0267f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-670f0267f5` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-670f0267f5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-670f0267f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.