Please branch and build unoconv in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain unoconv in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unoconv/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Note: A simple rebuild of unoconv-0.9.0-11.fc38 for epel9 seems to work.
Will you be able to branch and build unoconv in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.
I've now filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11488 according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/#epel_packagers_sig_members, because there was no response by the maintainer after three weeks and three attempts.
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.