Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Please branch and build unoconv in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain unoconv in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unoconv/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Note: A simple rebuild of unoconv-0.9.0-11.fc38 for epel9 seems to work.
Will you be able to branch and build unoconv in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.
I've now filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11488 according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/#epel_packagers_sig_members, because there was no response by the maintainer after three weeks and three attempts.
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1321ddff5b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.