Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionEwoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
2023-05-03 15:51:49 UTC
Since #35684 Puppet reports without messages can come in. The current Puppet report scanner looks at the last log message to determine the source, but if there is no message there is no way to identify it.
It would probably be best to add an explicit field for the origin, but the current API does not expose this.
https://community.theforeman.org/t/identify-config-report-origin/31465 has a more detailed analysis.
Comment 1Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
2023-05-03 15:51:54 UTC
This bugzilla appears to be a clone from the upstream redmine (35833) and a duplicate of bug 2192939. Since the description on 2192939 provides additional details on the scenarios, closing this one. If this is incorrect, please do re-open with appropriate details. Thanks!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2192939 ***