Description of problem: The test fails but only on non-dvr ovs environment, seen in several d/s CI jobs Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_port_forwardings.py", line 131, in test_port_forwarding_to_2_servers self._test_udp_port_forwarding(servers) File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_port_forwardings.py", line 120, in _test_udp_port_forwarding utils.wait_until_true( File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/neutron_tempest_plugin/common/utils.py", line 84, in wait_until_true while not predicate(): File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_port_forwardings.py", line 121, in <lambda> lambda: _message_received(server, ssh_client, expected_msg), File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_port_forwardings.py", line 100, in _message_received received_msg = self.nc_client( File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/base.py", line 620, in nc_client self.assertEqual(0, result.exit_status) File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/testtools/testcase.py", line 391, in assertEqual self.assertThat(observed, matcher, message) File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/testtools/testcase.py", line 478, in assertThat raise mismatch_error testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: 0 != 1 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHOS-17.1-RHEL-9-20230426.n.1 python3-neutron-tests-tempest-2.1.0-1.20230222141314.021ce91.el9ost.noarch How reproducible: 100% on non-dvr ovs environment Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run the test on a d/s CI job that uses non-dvr ovs environment 2. 3. Actual results: The test fails Expected results: The test passes Additional info: If I add a couple of seconds delay, after prepare_resources (line 127, see link below), the test passes https://github.com/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/blob/c4597e696de6ff48bbd76112059894e299e14718/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_port_forwardings.py#L127
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2210233 ***