Bug 2196046 - Branch and build for the epel9
Summary: Branch and build for the epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-asyncssh
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Georg Sauthoff
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-05-07 19:15 UTC by Matej Focko
Modified: 2023-07-20 00:35 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-asyncssh-2.13.2-3.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-07-20 00:35:56 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 58832 0 None None None 2023-05-07 19:15:36 UTC

Description Matej Focko 2023-05-07 19:15:36 UTC
Hi, could you please branch and build this package for EL9? It is a dependency of Ceph packages that are also used in RHEL9. Thanks a lot.

If you need any help, feel free to reach out.

Comment 1 Georg Sauthoff 2023-05-09 21:59:20 UTC
I've just requested an epel9 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/53142

Let's see if it builds out of the box there.

However, I don't want to invest too much effort into RHEL9 package maintenance, so I'll let you know when I need support.

There is already an epel8 branch which is maintained by Ken Dreyer (ktdreyer) so perhaps he is also interested in maintaining/co-maintaining the epel9 branch.

Comment 2 Georg Sauthoff 2023-05-10 23:04:00 UTC
Branch is now live and first build is submitted: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100993827

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2023-05-17 18:36:20 UTC
Thanks for reporting the test failures upstream in https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566

I suggest we conditionally skip the test failures on RHEL 9 for now. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-asyncssh/pull-request/5

Comment 4 Georg Sauthoff 2023-05-27 12:21:00 UTC
Pushed your change to the epel9 branch where the build now succeeded:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101563132

Comment 5 Georg Sauthoff 2023-06-04 15:36:30 UTC
Ron fixed the tests in his repository: https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566#issuecomment-1565729994

Can someone who actually runs RHEL9 test his changes and provide him feedback?

Comment 6 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2023-06-05 20:12:22 UTC
Sure, I've tested it on a RHEL 9 VM and reported back. Looks like we'll be able to ship a new version with the upstream fixes soon.

Comment 7 Casey Bodley 2023-07-12 15:00:54 UTC
https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566 has been resolved. is there anything else blocking this?

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-07-12 20:07:31 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba

Comment 9 Georg Sauthoff 2023-07-12 20:09:34 UTC
(In reply to Casey Bodley from comment #7)
> https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566 has been resolved. is there
> anything else blocking this?

No, I've updated the epel9 branch, re-enabled the tests and pushed the update to bodhi.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2023-07-13 01:52:08 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2023-07-20 00:35:56 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.