Bug 2202 - RPM 2.93 fails to compile on Solaris2.6 on ultrasparc
Summary: RPM 2.93 fails to compile on Solaris2.6 on ultrasparc
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Johnson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-04-15 20:58 UTC by bugge
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-04-17 17:18:01 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description bugge 1999-04-15 20:58:10 UTC 
RPM 2.93 fails to compile on an ultrasparc machine running
Solaris 2.6 due to lib/transaction.c using statfs calls
which mis-match those in Linux.  Solaris is moving to
statvfs which does match the statfs calls in Linux.  I have
a patch against configure.in and lib/transaction.c that will
fix the problem (uses sys/statvfs.h and struct statvfs in
the offending routine call) and will post it as soon as I
can get a bug id to send the patch against.
Comment 1 bugge 1999-04-15 21:02:59 UTC 
Patch file has been generated and submitted to bugzilla
Comment 2 bugge 1999-04-15 21:13:59 UTC 
You'd think by now I would actually test EVERYTHING before I submitt
patches... second email err make that the third email fixes the
aclocal file and the actual call tot he function in transactions.c
Comment 3 bugge 1999-04-15 21:19:59 UTC 
Send the patch to jbj@redhat.com if bugzilla failsYou'd think by now I would actually test EVERYTHING before I submitt
patches... second email err make that the third email fixes the
aclocal file and the actual call tot he function in transactions.c
Comment 4 Cristian Gafton 1999-04-16 01:13:59 UTC 
assigned to jbj
Comment 5 Jeff Johnson 1999-04-17 17:18:59 UTC 
Fixed in rpm-2.95 something.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.