Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos.spec SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-oneapi-1-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Repository files that make some Intel(TM) software available. Fedora Account System Username: junghans This request came out of discussion in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-workstation-repositories/pull-request/12 and then https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/381
Sorry, typo SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos-1-1.fc39.src.rpm and test build here: Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101183079
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5921272 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2204529-intel-repos/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05921272-intel-repos/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
I fixed: intel-repos.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog intel-repos.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog intel-repos.spec:6: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1) Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos.spec SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos-1-1.fc39.src.rpm
Created attachment 1964789 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 5921272 to 5921345
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5921345 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2204529-intel-repos/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05921345-intel-repos/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Taking this review...
I'm not sure this is allowed, but I've asked the committee to weigh in: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1279
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.