Bug 2204529 - Review Request: intel-repos - Repository files for Intel(TM) repositories
Summary: Review Request: intel-repos - Repository files for Intel(TM) repositories
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-05-16 00:26 UTC by Christoph Junghans
Modified: 2024-06-16 00:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5921272 to 5921345 (487 bytes, patch)
2023-05-16 01:11 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Christoph Junghans 2023-05-16 00:26:51 UTC
Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos.spec
SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-oneapi-1-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: Repository files that make some Intel(TM) software available.
Fedora Account System Username: junghans

This request came out of discussion in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-workstation-repositories/pull-request/12 and then https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/381

Comment 1 Christoph Junghans 2023-05-16 00:32:11 UTC
Sorry, typo

SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos-1-1.fc39.src.rpm

and test build here:

Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101183079

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2023-05-16 00:37:24 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5921272
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2204529-intel-repos/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05921272-intel-repos/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Christoph Junghans 2023-05-16 01:06:42 UTC
I fixed:
intel-repos.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
intel-repos.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
intel-repos.spec:6: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1)

Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos.spec
SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/intel-repos-1-1.fc39.src.rpm

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2023-05-16 01:11:41 UTC
Created attachment 1964789 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5921272 to 5921345

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2023-05-16 01:11:43 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5921345
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2204529-intel-repos/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05921345-intel-repos/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2023-05-16 01:28:09 UTC
Taking this review...

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2023-05-16 01:30:27 UTC
I'm not sure this is allowed, but I've asked the committee to weigh in: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1279

Comment 8 Package Review 2024-05-16 00:45:35 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 9 Package Review 2024-06-16 00:45:26 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.