Bug 2209493 - Observing health error on cluster due to "Module 'cephadm' has failed"
Summary: Observing health error on cluster due to "Module 'cephadm' has failed"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.1z1
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Mohit Bisht
Akash Raj
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2221020
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-05-24 03:42 UTC by Pawan
Modified: 2023-08-03 16:45 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.6-84.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Error-handling is updated to work with the python version used in {storage-product} 6.1 Previously, a new timeout on `cephadm` commands added in {storage-product} 6.1 would not work correctly due to a python version difference affecting the type of error generated. Due to this, whenever one of these timeouts actually happened, the generated error was not handled and the `cephadm` module would crash. With this fix, the error-handling is updated to work with the python version used in {storage-product} 6.1. When one of these timeouts occurs, it results in a health warning about what timed out, and the `cephadm` module no longer crashes.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-08-03 16:45:09 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-6728 0 None None None 2023-05-24 03:44:13 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:4473 0 None None None 2023-08-03 16:45:54 UTC

Description Pawan 2023-05-24 03:42:46 UTC
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2023-08-03 16:45:09 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:4473
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.