Bug 2210280 - Review Request: xdg-desktop-portal-xapp - Backend implementation for xdg-desktop-portal using Xapp
Summary: Review Request: xdg-desktop-portal-xapp - Backend implementation for xdg-desk...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pavel Solovev
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-05-26 13:03 UTC by leigh scott
Modified: 2023-06-08 17:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
daron439: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description leigh scott 2023-05-26 13:03:26 UTC
Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp.spec
SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
Description: Xapp's Cinnamon, MATE and XFCE backends for xdg-desktop-portal.
This allows sandboxed applications to request services and information from
outside the sandbox in the MATE, XFCE and Cinnamon environments
Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux

Comment 1 Pavel Solovev 2023-06-08 12:51:00 UTC
Can you update to the latest version? 1.0.1 was released.

> Release:        1
%{?dist} is missing.

Comment 3 Pavel Solovev 2023-06-08 13:33:29 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "Unknown or
     generated", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License, Version
     2.1", "GNU Library General Public License v2 or later", "GNU Lesser
     General Public License, Version 2.1 GNU Library General Public License
     v2 or later GNU General Public License v2.0 or later". 67 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/solopasha/build/review/2210280-xdg-desktop-portal-
     xapp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-1.0.1-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debugsource-1.0.1-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-1.0.1-1.fc39.src.rpm
======================================================== rpmlint session starts ========================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpk5cuuzvk')]
checks: 31, packages: 4

========================= 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =========================




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
======================================================== rpmlint session starts ========================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp8bw5gil_')]
checks: 31, packages: 1

========================= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s =========================





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 3

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/linuxmint/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp/archive/1.0.1/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-1.0.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 49cf71e89fb668b05d44a3e6f2e6ea8b533e6090acd12b4843a73d2dd7a3cc5a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 49cf71e89fb668b05d44a3e6f2e6ea8b533e6090acd12b4843a73d2dd7a3cc5a


Requires
--------
xdg-desktop-portal-xapp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    dbus-common
    dbus-x11
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)
    xapps
    xdg-desktop-portal
    xdg-desktop-portal-gtk

xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
xdg-desktop-portal-xapp:
    application()
    application(xdg-desktop-portal-xapp.desktop)
    xdg-desktop-portal-xapp
    xdg-desktop-portal-xapp(x86-64)

xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debuginfo
    xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debuginfo(x86-64)

xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debugsource:
    xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debugsource
    xdg-desktop-portal-xapp-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2210280
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, C/C++, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: fonts, PHP, SugarActivity, Haskell, Java, Python, Perl, Ocaml, R
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Approved.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-06-08 14:26:03 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal-xapp

Comment 5 leigh scott 2023-06-08 17:47:41 UTC
Thank you for the review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.