RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2211526 - srtp_init fails with NSS > 3.5.3
Summary: srtp_init fails with NSS > 3.5.3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libsrtp
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Wim Taymans
QA Contact: Robin Hack
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2163492 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-05-31 21:55 UTC by Michael Newton
Modified: 2023-11-07 10:08 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libsrtp-2.3.0-8.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-07 08:37:16 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1948729 0 unspecified CLOSED srtp_init() always returns srtp_err_status_cipher_fail 2023-11-01 00:01:36 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-158756 0 None None None 2023-05-31 21:58:22 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:6565 0 None None None 2023-11-07 08:37:18 UTC

Description Michael Newton 2023-05-31 21:55:36 UTC
An NSS update has broken some functionality in libsrtp. This has been fixed upstream for version 2.4[1], and was backported into Fedora 34[2], but remains a problem in EL9 and CentOS. See #1948729 for details and a patch that resolves the problem.

The problem manifested itself for us when trying to run Asterisk built on EL9.1 with libsrtp-2.3.0-7.el9 and encountered these error messages:

    WARNING[47044] res_srtp.c: Failed to initialize libsrtp
    ERROR[47044] loader.c: *** Failed to load module res_srtp.so
    ERROR[47044] asterisk.c: Module initialization failed.  ASTERISK EXITING!

Applying the patch and building locally resolved the issue, as did installing the updated Fedora RPM.

[1] https://github.com/cisco/libsrtp/commit/23576ff4c0ed505997eceace69a336f6bf629027
[2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9ac23c1745

Comment 1 Niels De Graef 2023-07-06 09:13:22 UTC
Wim, mind taking a look here? Looks like a trivial patch to include

Comment 2 Wim Taymans 2023-07-06 15:35:17 UTC
I made a merge request: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/libsrtp/-/merge_requests/3 just need QA ack to get it in.

Comment 4 Niels De Graef 2023-07-07 08:31:10 UTC
*** Bug 2163492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Gerd v. Egidy 2023-07-07 09:20:28 UTC
Would you consider adding the %check section I suggested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211526 ?

Or do you prefer if I propose that to be added to the package in Fedora?

Comment 6 Wim Taymans 2023-07-07 10:31:17 UTC
What %check option? (your link recursively links to this bug).

Yes, also add this to fedora if it's useful.

Comment 7 Gerd v. Egidy 2023-07-07 12:26:49 UTC
Oh, sorry, I got the link from the wrong tab.

I meant this one from the bug marked as duplicate:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163492#c0

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:37:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (libsrtp bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6565


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.