As seen in https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/03533289-6f2e-43cc-a169-5d4a793d8ae0/ annocheck reports fortify as failed in i686 binaries with one of these two messages: -------------- Hardened: /usr/bin/valgrind: FAIL: fortify test because no indication that the necessary option was used (and a C compiler was detected) (source: final scan) ----- or ----- Hardened: /usr/bin/valgrind-listener: FAIL: fortify test because -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[2|3] was not present on the command line (function: setsockopt) (source: annobin notes) -------------- The binaries are coming from valgrind-3.21.0-5.fc39 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2207502). However this test passes for the binaries inside valgrind-3.21.0-4.fc39 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2202010), and these were compiled and linked with the exact same flags. I also ran annocheck directly on the files of both valgrind builds to check that this is not caused by rpminspect: -------------- [/var/tmp/rpminspect/local.lbRZ70/root] $ annocheck --ignore-unknown --skip-lto --profile=rawhide after/i686/usr/bin/valgrind --debug-file=after/i686/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/valgrind-3.21.0-5.fc39.i386.debug annocheck: Version 12.10. Hardened: using profile: rawhide. Hardened: valgrind: FAIL: fortify test because no indication that the necessary option was used (and a C compiler was detected) Hardened: Rerun annocheck with --verbose to see more information on the tests. Hardened: valgrind: Overall: FAIL. [/var/tmp/rpminspect/local.lbRZ70/root] $ annocheck --ignore-unknown --skip-lto --profile=rawhide before/i686/usr/bin/valgrind --debug-file=before/i686/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/valgrind-3.21.0-4.fc39.i386.debug annocheck: Version 12.10. Hardened: using profile: rawhide. Hardened: valgrind: PASS. -------------- Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpminspect-fedora -v -a i686 -T annocheck valgrind-3.21.0-5.fc39 Actual Results: fortify test failed in /usr/bin/valgrind, /usr/bin/valgrind-listener, /usr/bin/vgdb Expected Results: fortify test pass.
The problem is that the new annobin string notes have been moved into the separate debuginfo file, but annocheck was not examining it...
Should be fixed in annobin-12.12-1.fc39
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle. Changing version to 39.