Bug 2212389 - Minimal RAM required/supported to run RHEL
Summary: Minimal RAM required/supported to run RHEL
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Sagar Dubewar
QA Contact: RHEL DPM
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-05 13:55 UTC by Nicolas Bourgeois
Modified: 2023-06-28 08:45 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-22 05:27:32 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-158978 0 None None None 2023-06-05 14:32:00 UTC

Description Nicolas Bourgeois 2023-06-05 13:55:28 UTC
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html-single/performing_a_standard_rhel_9_installation/index#system-requirements-reference_installing-RHEL

Section Number and Name: 
Section A.2, table A.1

Describe the issue: 
The documentation explains the minimal RAM requirement *to install* RHEL, but there is no minimum requirement to use RHEL once installed.

Suggestions for improvement: 
Explain which minimal RAM size is required/supported to run RHEL (install via a qcow image, a golden image VMware, or via an image created with imagebuilder)

Additional information: 
Same question for RHEL 8

Comment 3 Josh Boyer 2023-06-06 14:11:36 UTC
Can someone help me understand why the minimum amount of RAM to run RHEL is helpful?  The minimum documented for installation would be what we would recommend overall.  It is certainly possible to boot a stock RHEL qcow2 file with less memory, but ultimately it depends on the workload.  Two different images built with Image Builder will have different memory requirements depending on what is actually started at runtime, etc.

The installation limits are at least quasi-representative of some kind of workload (a rather common one that includes installing and updating packages).  Documenting anything less runs the risk of misleading customers.

Comment 12 Sagar Dubewar 2023-06-22 05:27:32 UTC
Hello +nbourgeo, please see the response above from Josh. 
----
Not necessarily. We should not publish a value as a minimum when we don't actually know that will be the case. For example, a local media installation may only take 1.5GB, but if that installed a desktop environment or a large number of packages and services that run the minimum required may be higher. Deployment type matters as well. For example, we recommend a minimum of 2GB per VM:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html-single/configuring_and_managing_virtualization/index#proc_enabling-virtualization-in-rhel-9_assembly_enabling-virtualization-in-rhel-9
----

As no more updates are pending on this issue, I am closing this issue without making any updates to the documentation. 

thank you :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.