Bug 2215030 - Request to add rubygem-asciidoctor into CRB
Summary: Request to add rubygem-asciidoctor into CRB
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rubygem-asciidoctor
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: ruby maint
QA Contact: RHEL CS Apps Subsystem QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-14 14:11 UTC by Marián Konček
Modified: 2023-07-24 13:02 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-07-24 13:02:42 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-159863 0 None None None 2023-06-14 14:11:33 UTC

Description Marián Konček 2023-06-14 14:11:04 UTC
Description of problem:
rubygem-asciidoctor is a vital package to build documentation. I would like to have it in the CRB repository at least in c9s. We use it to test documentation generation in our CI. I know it is present in the buildroot but I want to to be easily installable in the centos:stream9 container.

See for example: https://github.com/fedora-java/jurand/blob/67fb975a85cce7aa209c0490dfff1418d5db82c1/.github/workflows/ci.yaml#L26
which requires modifying the configs.

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2023-06-15 08:25:45 UTC
I don't object this proposal in general. Nevertheless:

1) we should make sure the RHEL package version is aligned with Fedora. Specifically, the RHEL package makes sure the test suite is enabled:

https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/rubygem-asciidoctor/-/commit/d02280e27c7fa37a92c4b3b501246ce2a7895510

where the similar change was not accepted into Fedora yet:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-asciidoctor/pull-request/6

and that in turn would mean troubles for RHEL10.

2) rubygem-asciidoctor is available in EPEL. We would need to drop the package from there. And I think the whole idea was to have the Asciidoctor available, but not block community from innovating by (possibly) keeping the Asciidoctor without updates.

Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2023-07-11 10:21:43 UTC
+1

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2023-07-11 10:22:56 UTC
Or build root would be also OK for us.

Comment 4 Jaroslav Škarvada 2023-07-11 10:30:23 UTC
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #3)
> Or build root would be also OK for us.

Yep, it seems it's already in the RHEL-9 buildroot, so we (TuneD maintainers) are happy :)

Comment 5 Marián Konček 2023-07-24 13:02:42 UTC
I think the package being present in EPEL / buildroot is acceptable.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.