RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2216456 - GTS-12 binutils-gold and binutils-devel rpms provide the wrong tags
Summary: GTS-12 binutils-gold and binutils-devel rpms provide the wrong tags
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gcc-toolset-12-binutils
Version: 9.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Nick Clifton
QA Contact: Miloš Prchlík
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2220917
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-21 13:27 UTC by Miloš Prchlík
Modified: 2023-11-07 10:08 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-19.el9
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2103056
: 2220917 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-07 08:37:19 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:6564 0 None None None 2023-11-07 08:37:22 UTC

Comment 4 Nick Clifton 2023-07-06 13:51:04 UTC 
Fixed in gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-17.el9_2
Comment 7 Nick Clifton 2023-08-01 11:45:25 UTC 
I have created a ticket to request that a gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0 branch be created for the CentOS binutils:

  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-1682
Comment 8 Nick Clifton 2023-08-03 09:26:00 UTC 
And a ticket to have a branch created in RHEL:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-965
Comment 9 Nick Clifton 2023-08-14 13:27:11 UTC 
Right, the branches have been created and the RHEL build has completed:

  https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=54634128

But the CentOS build is not working:

  $ centpkg build --target=scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0-candidate --rhel-target latest
  Could not execute build: Unknown build target: scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0-candidate

It looks like the scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0-candidate target needs 
to be added to the list supported by centos.  So I have created a ticket
to ask for this addition:

  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-1700
Comment 10 Nick Clifton 2023-08-15 12:25:46 UTC 
OK, I fixed the problem.  (Marek has told me that I needed the magic lines at the start of the binutils.spec file, but I had forgotten to add them).  The CentOS build is now complete:

 https://kojihub.stream.rdu2.redhat.com/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2699358
Comment 11 Miloš Prchlík 2023-08-17 07:55:46 UTC 
Nick, is the build name correct? It comes from the right branch, scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0, but the build itself, gcc-toolset-**13**-binutils-2.38-18.**el9** - I'd expect this to be a gcc-toolset-**12** build. Also the release part, the "drop" from el9_2.1 to simple el9 looks suspicious, `el9_3.1` maybe? Not sure though, might be perfectly correct :/
Comment 12 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 08:52:10 UTC 
(In reply to Miloš Prchlík from comment #11)
> Nick, is the build name correct? It comes from the right branch,
> scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0, but the build itself,
> gcc-toolset-**13**-binutils-2.38-18.**el9** -  


Oh *rude word*.  No, you are right.  I use copy/paste to add the magic lines to the start of the binutils.spec file that let it build in a CentOS 9 stream, but I forgot to edit the GTS version.  Rebuilding...
Comment 13 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 11:14:58 UTC 
Fingers crossed, this build will be correct: gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-19.el9

  https://kojihub.stream.rdu2.redhat.com/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2712088
Comment 19 Miloš Prchlík 2023-09-01 12:02:03 UTC 
Verified with gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-19.el9
Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:37:19 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (gcc-toolset-12-binutils bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6564
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.