Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2216456

Summary: GTS-12 binutils-gold and binutils-devel rpms provide the wrong tags
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Miloš Prchlík <mprchlik>
Component: gcc-toolset-12-binutilsAssignee: Nick Clifton <nickc>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Miloš Prchlík <mprchlik>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.2CC: dsmith, fweimer, markobri, mpolacek, mprchlik, nickc
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Bugfix, Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-19.el9 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2103056
: 2220917 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-07 08:37:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2220917    

Comment 4 Nick Clifton 2023-07-06 13:51:04 UTC
Fixed in gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-17.el9_2

Comment 7 Nick Clifton 2023-08-01 11:45:25 UTC
I have created a ticket to request that a gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0 branch be created for the CentOS binutils:

  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-1682

Comment 8 Nick Clifton 2023-08-03 09:26:00 UTC
And a ticket to have a branch created in RHEL:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-965

Comment 9 Nick Clifton 2023-08-14 13:27:11 UTC
Right, the branches have been created and the RHEL build has completed:

  https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=54634128

But the CentOS build is not working:

  $ centpkg build --target=scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0-candidate --rhel-target latest
  Could not execute build: Unknown build target: scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0-candidate

It looks like the scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0-candidate target needs 
to be added to the list supported by centos.  So I have created a ticket
to ask for this addition:

  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-1700

Comment 10 Nick Clifton 2023-08-15 12:25:46 UTC
OK, I fixed the problem.  (Marek has told me that I needed the magic lines at the start of the binutils.spec file, but I had forgotten to add them).  The CentOS build is now complete:

 https://kojihub.stream.rdu2.redhat.com/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2699358

Comment 11 Miloš Prchlík 2023-08-17 07:55:46 UTC
Nick, is the build name correct? It comes from the right branch, scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0, but the build itself, gcc-toolset-**13**-binutils-2.38-18.**el9** - I'd expect this to be a gcc-toolset-**12** build. Also the release part, the "drop" from el9_2.1 to simple el9 looks suspicious, `el9_3.1` maybe? Not sure though, might be perfectly correct :/

Comment 12 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 08:52:10 UTC
(In reply to Miloš Prchlík from comment #11)
> Nick, is the build name correct? It comes from the right branch,
> scl-gcc-toolset-12-rhel-9.3.0, but the build itself,
> gcc-toolset-**13**-binutils-2.38-18.**el9** -  


Oh *rude word*.  No, you are right.  I use copy/paste to add the magic lines to the start of the binutils.spec file that let it build in a CentOS 9 stream, but I forgot to edit the GTS version.  Rebuilding...

Comment 13 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 11:14:58 UTC
Fingers crossed, this build will be correct: gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-19.el9

  https://kojihub.stream.rdu2.redhat.com/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2712088

Comment 19 Miloš Prchlík 2023-09-01 12:02:03 UTC
Verified with gcc-toolset-12-binutils-2.38-19.el9

Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:37:19 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (gcc-toolset-12-binutils bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6564