Bug 2218044 - Review Request: guile-reader - A simple framework for building readers for GNU Guile
Summary: Review Request: guile-reader - A simple framework for building readers for GN...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://www.nongnu.org/guile-reader/%...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2218338
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-27 23:02 UTC by Benson Muite
Modified: 2023-06-28 19:04 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Benson Muite 2023-06-27 23:02:58 UTC
spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/guile-reader/fedora-38-x86_64/06119909-guile-reader/guile-reader.spec
srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/guile-reader/fedora-38-x86_64/06119909-guile-reader/guile-reader-0.6.3-1.fc38.src.rpm

description:
The idea is to make it easy to build procedures that extend
Guile’s read procedure. Readers supporting various syntax
variants can easily be written, possibly by re-using existing
“token readers” of a standard Scheme readers.

fas: fed500

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-06-27 23:07:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6119946
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2218044-guile-reader/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06119946-guile-reader/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.