RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Please apply Fedora commit 0d1c821 to CentOS Stream lapack package, as the man-pages have conflicting names with man-pages package (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lapack/c/0d1c8214fcfb79f81ca428543fe9fb29248bced3?branch=rawhide)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lapack-3.9.0-8.el9

How reproducible:
Always

Actual results:
Undeclared file conflicts:
man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch provides /usr/share/man/man3/MAX.3.gz which is also provided by lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64
man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch provides /usr/share/man/man3/MIN.3.gz which is also provided by lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64


Expected results:
No conflicts

Additional info:
Easy fix, only apply the patch already introduces in the Fedora lapack package

Please aim for the RHEL-9.3 ITR as we are rebasing the man-pages in this timeframe due to a request from the RHIVOS team: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-683

Hi, this issue starting to hit more and more people, could you please fix it?

It's a simple cherry-pick which shouldn't require much work.

*** Bug 2225523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

This is now blocking my ability to further develop images in the CentOS Alternative Images SIG and the CentOS Hyperscale SIG.

Example failed build: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3534240

Excerpt from image-root.x86_64.log:

Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/share/man/man3/MAX.3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch and lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64
  file /usr/share/man/man3/MIN.3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch and lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64

A fixed lapack has been built, but it is still in gating.
https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35237

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (lapack bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6555