Bug 2223179 - Review Request: python-referencing - An implementation-agnostic implementation of JSON reference resolution
Summary: Review Request: python-referencing - An implementation-agnostic implementatio...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Beasley
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2222367
Blocks: 2179260
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-16 08:56 UTC by Mattia Verga
Modified: 2023-07-26 17:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-07-26 17:03:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
code: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mattia Verga 2023-07-16 08:56:40 UTC
Spec URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/python-referencing/python-referencing.spec
SRPM URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/python-referencing/python-referencing-0.29.1-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: An implementation-agnostic implementation of JSON reference resolution.
In other words, a way for e.g. JSON Schema tooling to resolve the $ref
keyword across all drafts without needing to implement support themselves.
Fedora Account System Username: mattia

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2023-07-21 19:00:46 UTC
The package is APPROVED, with suggestions.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


===== Notes (no change required for approval) =====

- Versions 0.29.2, 0.29.3, and 0.30.0 are available. The source diff,

    https://github.com/python-jsonschema/referencing/compare/v0.29.1...v0.30.0

  does not show anything that would require packaging changes. In 0.30.0,
  upstream has declared official support for Python 3.12.

  (The test suite was updated to fe891e8ae5af7b623ed88db1f48ffb53eba9da21.)

  Please update to the latest version at your earliest convenience.

- Using the %{pypi_source} macro with zero arguments is deprecated:

    Source0:        %{pypi_source}

  Write %{pypi_source %{srcname}} instead.

  (My preference would be to drop the srcname macro and write out referencing
  everywhere it appears; I don’t think it this layer of indirection makes the
  spec file more legible or reusable in practice. However, this is purely a
  matter of subjective taste.)

- This is pretty noisy:

    # Unpack the test reference suite
    %setup -n %{srcname}-%{version} -a1

  Consider adding the -q argument to %setup.

    python-referencing.spec:53: W: setup-not-quiet

- Normally I would suggest generating the test dependencies with

    %pyproject_buildrequires test-requirements.in

  rather than using manual BuildRequires.

  In this case, you would need to adjust the file in %prep first:

    # No fancy stuff!
    sed -r 's/^file:/# &/' test-requirements.in | tee test-reqs.txt

  and then use the filtered requirements file.

  You might like that approach, or you might feel that it’s just as easy to
  keep writing out the BuildRequires for testing manually.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT
     License". 318 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/ben/Downloads/review/2223179-python-
     referencing/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.12, /usr/lib/python3.12/site-
     packages

     (spurious; these are owned by python3.12)

[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.12,
     /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages

     (spurious; these are owned by python3.12)

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.

     $ rpm -qL -p results/python3-referencing-0.29.1-1.fc39.noarch.rpm 
     /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/referencing-0.29.1.dist-info/licenses/COPYING

[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.

     (Tests pass)

[!]: Latest version is packaged.

     Versions 0.29.2, 0.29.3, and 0.30.0 are available.

[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)

     OK: rpmautospec differences only.

[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-referencing-0.29.1-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          python-referencing-0.29.1-1.fc39.src.rpm
=============================================== rpmlint session starts ===============================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpp2owog1b')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

python-referencing.src: W: strange-permission python-referencing.spec 600
python-referencing.spec:53: W: setup-not-quiet
python3-referencing.noarch: W: no-documentation
================ 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.6 s ================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

python3-referencing.noarch: W: no-documentation
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/python-jsonschema/referencing-suite/archive/fe891e8ae5af7b623ed88db1f48ffb53eba9da21/referencing-suite-fe891e8.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 92e165b7b457a4e364cf76cffce640b1d1858115d705c6e6974bba03578f8365
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 92e165b7b457a4e364cf76cffce640b1d1858115d705c6e6974bba03578f8365
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/r/referencing/referencing-0.29.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 90cb53782d550ba28d2166ef3f55731f38397def8832baac5d45235f1995e35e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 90cb53782d550ba28d2166ef3f55731f38397def8832baac5d45235f1995e35e


Requires
--------
python3-referencing (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3.12dist(attrs)
    python3.12dist(rpds-py)



Provides
--------
python3-referencing:
    python-referencing
    python3-referencing
    python3.12-referencing
    python3.12dist(referencing)
    python3dist(referencing)



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/ben/Downloads/review/2223179-python-referencing/srpm/python-referencing.spec	2023-07-21 10:44:32.989602368 -0400
+++ /home/ben/Downloads/review/2223179-python-referencing/srpm-unpacked/python-referencing.spec	2023-07-15 20:00:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,12 @@
+## START: Set by rpmautospec
+## (rpmautospec version 0.3.5)
+## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog
+%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
+    release_number = 1;
+    base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}"));
+    print(release_number + base_release_number - 1);
+}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}}
+## END: Set by rpmautospec
+
 %global srcname referencing
 
@@ -66,3 +76,4 @@
 
 %changelog
-%autochangelog
+* Sun Jul 16 2023 John Doe <packager> - 0.29.1-1
+- Uncommitted changes


Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2223179
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, fonts, SugarActivity, Perl, PHP, R, C/C++, Haskell, Java
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-07-26 16:28:20 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-referencing

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2023-07-26 17:00:42 UTC
FEDORA-2023-bf9d1aa42e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-bf9d1aa42e

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2023-07-26 17:03:06 UTC
FEDORA-2023-bf9d1aa42e has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.