RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2223783 - after upgrading to libwbclient-4.18.3-100.el9.x86_64 there is a dangling symbolic link
Summary: after upgrading to libwbclient-4.18.3-100.el9.x86_64 there is a dangling symb...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2216712
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andreas Schneider
QA Contact: sssd-qe
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-18 22:13 UTC by Andrew Schorr
Modified: 2023-07-25 11:56 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-07-25 11:56:04 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-162666 0 None None None 2023-07-18 22:13:49 UTC

Description Andrew Schorr 2023-07-18 22:13:09 UTC
Description of problem:
After upgrading to libwbclient-4.18.3-100.el9.x86_64, I have this invalid symlink:
bash-5.1$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/libwbclient.so.0.15-64 
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 Jun 22  2022 /etc/alternatives/libwbclient.so.0.15-64 -> /usr/lib64/samba/wbclient/libwbclient.so.0.15
bash-5.1$ wc /etc/alternatives/libwbclient.so.0.15-64 
wc: /etc/alternatives/libwbclient.so.0.15-64: No such file or directory


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libwbclient-4.18.3-100.el9.x86_64


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -Uvh libwbclient-4.18.3-100.el9.x86_64.rpm
2. wc /etc/alternatives/libwbclient.so.0.15-64
3.

Actual results:
wc: /etc/alternatives/libwbclient.so.0.15-64: No such file or directory


Expected results:
File does not exist


Additional info:
I think the preuninstall scriptlet is broken. It says:

bash-5.1$ rpm --scripts -q libwbclient
preuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then
    /usr/sbin/update-alternatives \
            --remove \
            libwbclient.so.0.16-64 \
            /usr/lib64/samba/wbclient/libwbclient.so.0.16
fi
/sbin/ldconfig
posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
# It has to be posttrans here to make sure all files of a previous version
# without alternatives support are removed
/usr/sbin/update-alternatives \
        --install \
        /usr/lib64/libwbclient.so.0.16 \
        libwbclient.so.0.16-64 \
        /usr/lib64/samba/wbclient/libwbclient.so.0.16 \
        10

I believe the [ $1 -eq 0 ] test means that the alternative is removed
only on uninstall, so an upgrade to a new version leaves the dangling
symlink behind.

Regards,
Andy

Comment 1 Andreas Schneider 2023-07-25 11:56:04 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2216712 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.