Bug 2224175 - Review Request: rust-galvanic-test - Testing framework for setting up test fixtures/environments
Summary: Review Request: rust-galvanic-test - Testing framework for setting up test fi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-20 06:24 UTC by blinxen
Modified: 2023-10-10 18:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-10-10 18:33:58 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description blinxen 2023-07-20 06:24:25 UTC
Spec URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-galvanic-test/rust-galvanic-test.spec
SRPM URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/rust-galvanic-test/rust-galvanic-test-0.2.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
A testing framework for setting up and tearing up test
fixtures/environments with support for parameterised test cases. This
crate is part of galvanic---a complete test framework for Rust.

Fedora Account System Username: blinxen

Comment 1 Fabio Valentini 2023-07-27 14:45:00 UTC
Packages fail to install due to missing package for galvanic-mock:

Error: 
 Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides (crate(galvanic-mock/default) >= 0.1.0 with crate(galvanic-mock/default) < 0.2.0~) needed by rust-galvanic-test+galvanic-mock-devel-0.2.0-1.fc39.noarch
 Problem 2: package rust-galvanic-test+galvanic_mock_integration-devel-0.2.0-1.fc39.noarch requires crate(galvanic-test/galvanic-mock) = 0.2.0, but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
  - nothing provides (crate(galvanic-mock/default) >= 0.1.0 with crate(galvanic-mock/default) < 0.2.0~) needed by rust-galvanic-test+galvanic-mock-devel-0.2.0-1.fc39.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Not sure if it's worth packaging an entire test framework just to run tests in one crate.

Comment 2 blinxen 2023-10-10 18:33:58 UTC
I don't have any interest in packaging this crate anymore.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.