Bug 2224783 - Review Request: dragonbox - Reference implementation of Dragonbox in C++
Summary: Review Request: dragonbox - Reference implementation of Dragonbox in C++
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Wang
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/jk-jeon/dragonbox
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-22 18:47 UTC by Mattia Verga
Modified: 2023-08-10 13:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
topazus: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mattia Verga 2023-07-22 18:47:17 UTC
Spec URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/dragonbox/dragonbox.spec
SRPM URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/dragonbox/dragonbox-1.1.3-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: Dragonbox is a float-to-string conversion algorithm based on a beautiful algorithm Schubfach, developed by Raffaello Giulietti in 2017-2018. Dragonbox is further inspired by Grisu and Grisu-Exact.
Fedora Account System Username: mattia

Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103754677

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-07-22 18:52:02 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6204266
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2224783-dragonbox/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06204266-dragonbox/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Felix Wang 2023-07-25 07:06:34 UTC
Taking this.

Comment 3 Felix Wang 2023-07-25 07:39:52 UTC
I only see an issue: static library should be avoided as possible. The remaining things LGTM.

Comment 4 Mattia Verga 2023-08-02 12:35:53 UTC
(In reply to Felix Wang from comment #3)
> I only see an issue: static library should be avoided as possible. The
> remaining things LGTM.

This is a header only library, so adheres to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

BTW, if you're willing to make a formal review, you should set the ticket status to ASSIGNED and set yourself as the assignee.
Thanks.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.