Bug 2225410 - Punjabi provide both Gurmukhi and Arabic fonts
Summary: Punjabi provide both Gurmukhi and Arabic fonts
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: langpacks
Version: 39
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag Nemade
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-25 09:31 UTC by Jens Petersen
Modified: 2023-09-15 18:39 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: langpacks-4.0-9.fc40 langpacks-4.0-9.fc39
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-08-24 14:04:35 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jens Petersen 2023-07-25 09:31:03 UTC 
Currently we have one langpack for Panjabi: langpack-pa etc.

It seems in Pakistan Arabic is prolific whereas in India I think Gurmukhi script is used.

So we could provide both Gurmukhi and Arabic by default, which might be simpler.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf rq -q --requires langpacks-fonts-pa
2. dnf rq -q --requires default-fonts-pa

Actual Results:  
Mixture of sans and serif fonts

1. default-fonts-pa = 4.0-4.fc39
   google-noto-naskh-arabic-vf-fonts
2. google-noto-sans-gurmukhi-vf-fonts

Expected Results:  
Consistent complete set of fonts

Well at least we are not too far off, since we currently install both those fonts by default in Fedora.
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2023-08-16 08:13:32 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle.
Changing version to 39.
Comment 2 A S Alam 2023-08-21 12:52:03 UTC 
For fonts, I think single package will be most realistic solution. There is no single solution is working for Punjabi/Panjabi with region as Punjabi has two scripts and font are used by scripts, not by region.
Comment 3 A S Alam 2023-08-21 12:53:22 UTC 
Package means langpack
Comment 4 Akira TAGOH 2023-08-23 10:46:37 UTC 
That looks like an error. it should be simply dropped.
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-08-24 12:31:43 UTC 
FEDORA-2023-0cc8ce6c13 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0cc8ce6c13
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-08-24 13:20:29 UTC 
FEDORA-2023-5114bb96cf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5114bb96cf
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2023-08-24 14:04:35 UTC 
FEDORA-2023-0cc8ce6c13 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-08-25 01:42:13 UTC 
FEDORA-2023-5114bb96cf has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-5114bb96cf`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5114bb96cf

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2023-09-15 18:39:48 UTC 
FEDORA-2023-5114bb96cf has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.