Bug 2227086 - Review Request: libimobiledevice-glue - Library with common code among libimobiledevice projects
Summary: Review Request: libimobiledevice-glue - Library with common code among libimo...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Lind
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/libimobiledevice/l...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2217642
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-27 18:43 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2024-08-15 00:01 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-08-15 05:04:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
michel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2023-07-27 18:43:58 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/libimobiledevice-glue/libimobiledevice-glue.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/libimobiledevice-glue/libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
The libimobiledevice-glue library is library with common code used by libraries
and tools around the libimobiledevice project

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-07-27 18:47:56 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6217959
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2227086-libimobiledevice-glue/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06217959-libimobiledevice-glue/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2023-07-27 19:30:11 UTC
LGTM. presumably upstream does not have a test suite

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
     Version 2.1", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License,
     Version 2.1", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU
     General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General
     Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public
     License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "X11
     License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later",
     "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public
     License, Version 2", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention)",
     "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later". 15 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/davide/2227086-libimobiledevice-
     glue/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 3495 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libimobiledevice-glue-devel-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
====================================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpklxtnjk1')]
checks: 31, packages: 5

======================= 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.7 s =======================




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
====================================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmplu1l3twy')]
checks: 31, packages: 1

======================= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =======================





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 4

 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/libimobiledevice/libimobiledevice-glue/releases/download/1.0.0/libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0.tar.bz2 :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 160a70e2edc318312fc40b6a71f85bfdfabdfba10bcfc5bb6fb40ed95088f4a0
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 160a70e2edc318312fc40b6a71f85bfdfabdfba10bcfc5bb6fb40ed95088f4a0


Requires
--------
libimobiledevice-glue (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libplist-2.0.so.4()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libimobiledevice-glue-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libimobiledevice-glue(x86-64)
    libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(libplist-2.0)

libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
libimobiledevice-glue:
    libimobiledevice-glue
    libimobiledevice-glue(x86-64)
    libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.so.0()(64bit)

libimobiledevice-glue-devel:
    libimobiledevice-glue-devel
    libimobiledevice-glue-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(libimobiledevice-glue-1.0)

libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.so.0.0.0-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
    libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo
    libimobiledevice-glue-debuginfo(x86-64)

libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource:
    libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource
    libimobiledevice-glue-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2227086 -o=--enablerepo=davide-sidetag
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, C/C++, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, PHP, Perl, SugarActivity, Haskell, Ocaml, fonts, R, Python
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-07-27 19:40:03 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libimobiledevice-glue

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2024-08-14 23:56:48 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-467c3dd17e (libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-4.el10_0) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-467c3dd17e

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-08-15 00:01:25 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-467c3dd17e (libimobiledevice-glue-1.0.0-4.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.