Bug 222769 - eggcups backtrace
Summary: eggcups backtrace
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: desktop-printing   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-16 03:26 UTC by Sam Varshavchik
Modified: 2008-01-25 17:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-25 17:15:20 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
backtrace captures by bug-buddy (8.23 KB, text/plain)
2007-01-16 03:26 UTC, Sam Varshavchik
no flags Details

Description Sam Varshavchik 2007-01-16 03:26:07 UTC
Several times a week, bug-buddy catches an eggcups backtrace

Looks like something in eggcups is calling abort()

desktop-printing-0.19-21.fc6

All current updates applied.

Comment 1 Sam Varshavchik 2007-01-16 03:26:08 UTC
Created attachment 145646 [details]
backtrace captures by bug-buddy

Comment 2 csb sysadmin 2008-01-25 16:23:06 UTC
same thing in RHEL5 with desktop-printing-0.19-20.el5

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2008-01-25 17:15:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> same thing in RHEL5 with desktop-printing-0.19-20.el5

Please try the update from RHBA-2007-1039 (see bug #215888).  If that does not
work, please open a new bug report against Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, including
as much information about the crash as you can.  Thanks.

Comment 4 csb sysadmin 2008-01-25 17:44:39 UTC
I don't have permission to see that bug. I'm getting the error: You are not
authorized to access bug #215888. Access to some bugs is restricted due to
embargoed security issues or respect for customer and partner information which
must remain confidential. Google search and RH bugzilla search for
RHBA-2007-1039 or RHSA-2007-1039 returns nothing (except for this bug).

Comment 5 Tim Waugh 2008-01-25 17:51:16 UTC
Hmm, here is the relevant part:

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-1039.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.