Bug 2228918 - Review Request: jedit - Programmer's text editor
Summary: Review Request: jedit - Programmer's text editor
Keywords:
Status: POST
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vasiliy Glazov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://www.jedit.org/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-08-03 15:39 UTC by zzambers
Modified: 2023-08-07 12:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
vascom2: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6238131 to 6238651 (2.51 KB, patch)
2023-08-03 18:59 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6238651 to 6241063 (4.44 KB, patch)
2023-08-04 14:18 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-08-03 15:45:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6238131
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2228918-jedit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06238131-jedit/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Kalev Lember 2023-08-03 16:58:42 UTC
A few nitpicks as I happened to look at the spec file. I don't know java packaging so the rest is gibberish to me :)


> License:        GPLv2+

Can you update this to use SPDX? Fedora recently switched to use the SPDX license tags and all new packages are supposed to use them now.


> gzip %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/jedit.1

Is this actually needed? I thought there was a brp script that automatically compressed all man pages.


> %{_mandir}/man1/jedit.1.gz

If you take the gzip line out from above, then it would probably make sense to glob this in the %files section with jedit.1* or similar, which would allow potential changes to the man page compression algorithm in the future (in case brp-compress is updated to compress them with something else).


> %description
> Programmer's text editor

Is there a full sentence you could copy from somewhere and put here?

Comment 3 zzambers 2023-08-03 18:54:16 UTC
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #2)
> A few nitpicks as I happened to look at the spec file. I don't know java
> packaging so the rest is gibberish to me :)

Thanks for your review. I have addressed all these problems + some typos in comments :) .

Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/zzambers/fedora-pkgs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06238641-jedit/jedit.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/zzambers/fedora-pkgs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06238641-jedit/jedit-5.6.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2023-08-03 18:59:21 UTC
Created attachment 1981507 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6238131 to 6238651

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2023-08-03 18:59:23 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6238651
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2228918-jedit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06238651-jedit/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Vasiliy Glazov 2023-08-04 06:45:32 UTC
%{_javadir}/%{name}/**
Is it a typo?

Comment 7 Vasiliy Glazov 2023-08-04 06:50:59 UTC
Need to add
Requires: javapackages-filesystem

Comment 8 zzambers 2023-08-04 14:12:01 UTC
Thanks for your review.

I updated %files to be saner and added dependency. Also I have realized, that whole thing should not probably go to %{_javadir}. Looking at other packages (ant, tomcat), correct thing to do seem to be to install package to %{_datadir} and only place jar files to %{_javadir} and then symlink them. So I have done that. Finally, I was doing some experiments in the meantime, and I was able to make generated doc working (tried switching from saxon to xalan, turned out fix was much easier than I expected).

Changes:
- added Requires: javapackages-filesystem
- updated %files to be saner
- moved jedit install dir to %{_datadir}/jedit, only jedit.jar file remains in %{_javadir}
- enabled generated doc (using xalan) + added required BuildRequires
- updated License to also include license of added doc
- removed some trailing spaces in spec

Sorry for additional changes.

Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/zzambers/fedora-pkgs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06240960-jedit/jedit.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/zzambers/fedora-pkgs/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06240960-jedit/jedit-5.6.0-1.fc39.noarch.rpm

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2023-08-04 14:18:25 UTC
Created attachment 1981639 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6238651 to 6241063

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2023-08-04 14:18:27 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6241063
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2228918-jedit/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06241063-jedit/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 12 Vasiliy Glazov 2023-08-07 05:59:24 UTC
As you generate doc files it must be installed into a directory of %{_javadocdir}/%{name} as part of javadoc subpackage.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation

Comment 13 zzambers 2023-08-07 11:33:13 UTC
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #12)
> As you generate doc files it must be installed into a directory of
> %{_javadocdir}/%{name} as part of javadoc subpackage.
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation

I currently don't generate javadoc (i.e. java API documentation). There is html doc generated from docbook xml files. It includes "users-guide", "whatsnew" and "FAQ", which can be read through program help window (by F1 key or "Help->jEdit Help").

Comment 14 Vasiliy Glazov 2023-08-07 11:40:51 UTC
Approved.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE.md is not marked as %license
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on javapackages-tools
  (jpackage-utils)
- Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
  subpackage
  Note: No javadoc subpackage present. Note: Javadocs are optional for
  Fedora versions >= 21
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation
- Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
  Note: No javadoc subpackage present
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or
     later", "Apache License 1.1", "GNU Free Documentation License v1.1",
     "*No copyright* GNU General Public License", "GNU General Public
     License, Version 2", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License GNU
     Free Documentation License v1.1 or later", "*No copyright* Public
     domain", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later", "*No
     copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 3", "*No copyright* GNU
     Free Documentation License v1.1 or later", "*No copyright* GNU General
     Public License v2.0 or later", "BSD 3-Clause License", "*No copyright*
     GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU Library General Public
     License v2 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "GNU
     Lesser General Public License Sun Public License v1.0", "GNU Library
     General Public License v2 or later [obsolete FSF postal address
     (Temple Place)]". 918 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/vascom/2228918-jedit/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 4402 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

Maven:
[-]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
     when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Java:
[x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.)
[x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: jedit-5.6.0-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          jedit-5.6.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
================================================================================ rpmlint session starts ================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp4fmum612')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

jedit.noarch: E: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/java/jedit.jar
jedit.noarch: E: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/jedit/jedit.jar
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.DOC.txt
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.txt
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/keymaps/German_Keyboard_keys.props
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/C/Include_Guard.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Clipboard/Paste_Indent.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Editing/Duplicate_Lines_Above.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Editing/Duplicate_Lines_Below.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Editing/Mode_Switcher.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Browse_Buffer_Directory.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Browse_Directory.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Buffer_Switcher.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Duplicate_Buffer.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Open_Path.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Open_Selection.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Open_Selection_In_Desktop.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Send_Buffer_To_Next_Split.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Toggle_ReadOnly.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Interface/Splitpane_Grow.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Java/Get_Package_Name.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Java/Java_File_Save.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Buffer_to_HyperSearch_Results.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Debug_BufferSets.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Debug_ScreenLines.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Display_Abbreviations.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Display_Actions.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Display_Shortcuts.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Evaluate_Buffer_in_BeanShell.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Hex_Convert.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/HyperSearch_Results_to_Buffer.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Make_Bug_Report.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Run_Script.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Show_Threads.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/Create_Plugin_Announcement.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/Look_and_Feel_Properties.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/System_Properties.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/jEdit_Properties.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Add_Prefix_and_Suffix.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Color_Picker.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Duplicate_Line.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Insert_Date.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Insert_Tag.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Next_Char.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/modes/haxe.xml
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.DOC.txt
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/jedit/doc/README.txt /usr/share/doc/jedit/README.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/Apache.LICENSE.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/Apache.LICENSE.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.DOC.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.DOC.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.PLUGINS.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.PLUGINS.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.txt
================================================ 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 47 errors, 5 warnings, 47 badness; has taken 0.6 s ================================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

jedit.noarch: E: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/java/jedit.jar
jedit.noarch: E: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/jedit/jedit.jar
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.DOC.txt
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.txt
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/keymaps/German_Keyboard_keys.props
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/C/Include_Guard.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Clipboard/Paste_Indent.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Editing/Duplicate_Lines_Above.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Editing/Duplicate_Lines_Below.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Editing/Mode_Switcher.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Browse_Buffer_Directory.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Browse_Directory.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Buffer_Switcher.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Duplicate_Buffer.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Open_Path.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Open_Selection.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Open_Selection_In_Desktop.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Send_Buffer_To_Next_Split.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Files/Toggle_ReadOnly.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Interface/Splitpane_Grow.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Java/Get_Package_Name.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Java/Java_File_Save.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Buffer_to_HyperSearch_Results.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Debug_BufferSets.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Debug_ScreenLines.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Display_Abbreviations.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Display_Actions.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Display_Shortcuts.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Evaluate_Buffer_in_BeanShell.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Hex_Convert.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/HyperSearch_Results_to_Buffer.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Make_Bug_Report.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Run_Script.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Misc/Show_Threads.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/Create_Plugin_Announcement.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/Look_and_Feel_Properties.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/System_Properties.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Properties/jEdit_Properties.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Add_Prefix_and_Suffix.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Color_Picker.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Duplicate_Line.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Insert_Date.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Insert_Tag.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/macros/Text/Next_Char.bsh
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/jedit/modes/haxe.xml
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.DOC.txt
jedit.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/jedit/doc/README.txt /usr/share/doc/jedit/README.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/Apache.LICENSE.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/Apache.LICENSE.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.DOC.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.DOC.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.PLUGINS.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.PLUGINS.txt
jedit.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/jedit/COPYING.txt /usr/share/jedit/doc/COPYING.txt
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 47 errors, 5 warnings, 47 badness; has taken 0.3 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://sourceforge.net/projects/jedit/files/jedit/5.6.0/jedit5.6.0source.tar.bz2 :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 76c16ae0168d9b64ecddd8bf08aa49ab352adb2c9687191bc71895a96a8dfe1d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 76c16ae0168d9b64ecddd8bf08aa49ab352adb2c9687191bc71895a96a8dfe1d


Requires
--------
jedit (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/sh
    java
    javapackages-filesystem
    which



Provides
--------
jedit:
    application()
    application(jedit.desktop)
    jedit
    mimehandler(text/plain)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2228918
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Java, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: fonts, R, Python, PHP, Perl, Ocaml, Haskell, SugarActivity, C/C++
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 15 Vasiliy Glazov 2023-08-07 11:41:45 UTC
Also please bugreport upstream about incorrect FSF address in sources and license files.

Comment 16 zzambers 2023-08-07 12:37:57 UTC
Thank you.

I have created ticked for incorrect FSF address here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4127/

Comment 17 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-08-07 12:49:33 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jedit


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.