Bug 2234735 - Revert brownfield changes in OCS operator for 4.14
Summary: Revert brownfield changes in OCS operator for 4.14
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.14
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.14.0
Assignee: Santosh Pillai
QA Contact: shylesh
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-08-25 10:08 UTC by Santosh Pillai
Modified: 2023-11-08 18:55 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.14.0-144
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-08 18:54:25 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 2188 0 None open Bug 2234735:[release-4.14] Revert "support osd migration in RDR customers" 2023-09-14 12:55:45 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 2190 0 None open Revert "Bug 2234735:[release-4.14] Revert "support osd migration in RDR customers"" 2023-09-15 05:25:38 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 2203 0 None open [DNM]Bug 2234735:[release-4.14] Revert "support osd migration in RDR customers 2023-09-29 09:35:52 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2023:6832 0 None None None 2023-11-08 18:55:03 UTC

Description Santosh Pillai 2023-08-25 10:08:47 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

Remove the brownfield changes added to the OCS operator in 4.14

PR that needs to be reverted: https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-operator/pull/2162

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 5 Santosh Pillai 2023-09-05 13:31:26 UTC
This PR is about reverting the existing PR - https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/12715. We intend to keep this change for sometime. I'll confirm with Mudit how long we want to delay reverting this.

Comment 6 Mudit Agarwal 2023-09-06 09:08:59 UTC
Shouldn't we be reverting the ocs-operator and not the rook PR?

Comment 7 Mudit Agarwal 2023-09-06 09:10:41 UTC
Also, this is already a blocker so we can keep it open till RC also.
Create a revert PR and move this to POST?

Comment 8 Santosh Pillai 2023-09-11 03:41:53 UTC
(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #6)
> Shouldn't we be reverting the ocs-operator and not the rook PR?

Right. I wanted to add the OCS operator PR link. I'll create a PR to revert the OCS operator changes.

Comment 9 Mudit Agarwal 2023-09-15 07:32:22 UTC
We still need to revert

Comment 11 shylesh 2023-10-31 20:50:10 UTC
Verified on the build 4.14.0-157.

1. Deployed 4.13 ODF with 4.14 ocp cluster 
2. Upgraded the ODF to 4.14.0-157

After the upgrade we see only bluestore in /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0/type.

sh-5.1# cat /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0/type
bluestore

Thanks to Pratik Surve for helping me to verify this bug.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-08 18:54:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.14.0 security, enhancement & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:6832


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.