Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2236242 - [RFE] Add option to backup only local repositories
Summary: [RFE] Add option to backup only local repositories
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1463831
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Satellite Maintain
Version: 6.12.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Satellite QE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-08-30 19:08 UTC by Jessica Richards
Modified: 2024-02-10 04:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-10-12 12:59:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-20614 0 None None None 2023-10-05 12:46:30 UTC

Description Jessica Richards 2023-08-30 19:08:24 UTC
1. Proposed title of this feature request

[RFE] Add option to backup only local repositories

3. What is the nature and description of the request?

Currently, satellite-maintain backups can include either all repositories, or none of them.  Adding an option to include local repositories (i.e. repositories that have no upstream URLs) would be very helpful.

4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

Backing up all RPMs is unhelpful when repositories can be synchronized, because they can needlessly increase both the time and storage required to export and import a backup.

Backing up no RPMs can be problematic when customers create local repositories, because they may not have a good way to retrieve those RPMs if they are not included within the Satellite backup.

Adding an option to back up just the local repositories can address both of these problems, and will be more helpful than either of the two existing options in most cases, for most customers.

5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

.

6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

- add a syncable repository to a satellite server
- add a local repository to the satellite server and upload a third-party package to it
- create a backup of just the local repositories
- check the backup to verify that the contents of the local repository are there

7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?

no

8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL8, RHEL9)?

no

9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?

no

10. List any affected packages or components.

foreman-maintain

11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?

yes

Comment 4 Eric Helms 2023-10-12 12:59:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1463831 ***

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-02-10 04:25:14 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.