PR: https://github.com/RamenDR/ramen/pull/1060
VERIFICATION COMMENTS: ====================== Steps to reproduce ------------------ --> Create an application and its namespace with their names of length of 35 chars, the length of policy.open-cluster-management.io was limited, which led to issues with drpc and vrgs failing the deployment. Fix is to add `vs-secret` as prefix in the name of policies, in case of application and namespace name exceeds 62 chars. O/Ps ---- oc get policies.policy.open-cluster-management.io -A NAMESPACE NAME REMEDIATION ACTION COMPLIANCE STATE AGE kmanohar-clu1 openshift-gitops.busybox-1-cephfs-c1-placement-drpc-vs-secret Compliant 33h kmanohar-clu1 openshift-gitops.busybox-1-cephfs-c2-placement-drpc-vs-secret Compliant 9h kmanohar-clu1 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-3316b73f7ab9451db40cd2ef8ce302dc Compliant 8h kmanohar-clu1 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-4010e649d5d5f9738383d493d091f466 Compliant 158m kmanohar-clu1 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-c80cbd719af0d3a969735df1b9751592 Compliant 6h59m kmanohar-clu1 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-d92652c9d8766d7d0fc77b726e2079cb Compliant 8h kmanohar-clu1 openshift-operators.0eb4d5937ba374896ab0a0f1f8d824acedbecc4 Enforce Compliant 6d10h kmanohar-clu1 openshift-operators.b6a6f041c1181265bbc16e669ce8d5201dbd902 Enforce Compliant 6d10h kmanohar-clu2 openshift-gitops.busybox-1-cephfs-c1-placement-drpc-vs-secret Compliant 33h kmanohar-clu2 openshift-gitops.busybox-1-cephfs-c2-placement-drpc-vs-secret Compliant 9h kmanohar-clu2 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-3316b73f7ab9451db40cd2ef8ce302dc Compliant 8h kmanohar-clu2 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-4010e649d5d5f9738383d493d091f466 Compliant 158m kmanohar-clu2 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-c80cbd719af0d3a969735df1b9751592 Compliant 6h59m kmanohar-clu2 openshift-gitops.vs-secret-d92652c9d8766d7d0fc77b726e2079cb Compliant 8h kmanohar-clu2 openshift-operators.0eb4d5937ba374896ab0a0f1f8d824acedbecc4 Enforce Compliant 6d10h kmanohar-clu2 openshift-operators.b6a6f041c1181265bbc16e669ce8d5201dbd902 Enforce Compliant 6d10h openshift-gitops busybox-1-cephfs-c1-placement-drpc-vs-secret Compliant 33h openshift-gitops busybox-1-cephfs-c2-placement-drpc-vs-secret Compliant 9h openshift-gitops vs-secret-3316b73f7ab9451db40cd2ef8ce302dc Compliant 8h <------- openshift-gitops vs-secret-4010e649d5d5f9738383d493d091f466 Compliant 158m <------- openshift-gitops vs-secret-c80cbd719af0d3a969735df1b9751592 Compliant 6h59m <------- openshift-gitops vs-secret-d92652c9d8766d7d0fc77b726e2079cb Compliant 8h <------- openshift-operators 0eb4d5937ba374896ab0a0f1f8d824acedbecc4 Enforce Compliant 6d10h openshift-operators b6a6f041c1181265bbc16e669ce8d5201dbd902 Enforce Compliant 6d10h Must gather: ------------ c1 - http://rhsqe-repo.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com/OCS/ocs-qe-bugs/keerthana/bz-v/bz-2236387/c1/ c2 - http://rhsqe-repo.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com/OCS/ocs-qe-bugs/keerthana/bz-v/bz-2236387/c2/ hub - http://rhsqe-repo.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com/OCS/ocs-qe-bugs/keerthana/bz-v/bz-2236387/hub/ Verified on: ------------ ODF - 4.14.0-150 OCP - 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-17-113123 MCO - 4.14.0-150 Submariner - 0.16.0(brew.registry.redhat.io/rh-osbs/iib:599799) ACM - 2.9.0 (2.9.0-DOWNSTREAM-2023-10-03-20-08-35)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.14.0 security, enhancement & bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:6832