Bug 2236736 - EPEL9 branch for python-h5io?
Summary: EPEL9 branch for python-h5io?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-h5io
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-09-01 12:23 UTC by Ben Beasley
Modified: 2023-09-14 00:32 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-h5io-0.1.9-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-14 00:32:11 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ben Beasley 2023-09-01 12:23:47 UTC
It looks like the current Rawhide package for python-h5io would build unmodified for EPEL9. I think we could maintain an EPEL9 branch for this package without additional workload except one more build and one more Bodhi update for each patch release.

This bug is just to give you an opportunity to comment before I request the branch. Feel free to set me as the EPEL bug assignee on the project page.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2023-09-05 14:10:01 UTC
Sounds good, please proceed as needed :)

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2023-09-05 16:38:01 UTC
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #1)
> Sounds good, please proceed as needed :)

Thanks—but oops, I only have commit access via the neuro-sig packager group, which isn’t enough to request the branch. Could you please request it, and I’ll do the rest?

Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2023-09-05 16:51:03 UTC
Sure, I tried, but it didn't work:

$ fedpkg request-branch --repo python-h5io epel9

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56083 -> error.

Did I do this wrong? I've updated neuro-sig rights to admin on the package too now, just so it isn't blocked on me.

Comment 4 Ben Beasley 2023-09-05 16:57:24 UTC
Seems like a transient network issue. Maybe close the fedora-scm-requests issue and try again?

Apparently even group admin is not enough to request a branch anymore? I’m pretty sure that it used to be possible to do this without being an individual maintainer. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56084

Comment 5 Ben Beasley 2023-09-05 16:58:18 UTC
Looks like manual intervention on https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56083 saved the day.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-09-05 18:59:43 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9df1b2cdda has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9df1b2cdda

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2023-09-06 00:23:51 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9df1b2cdda has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9df1b2cdda

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-09-14 00:32:11 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9df1b2cdda has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.