Package review of this new release. The spec file https://github.com/kgoldman/ibmtss/blob/next/tss2.spec has been test with fedpkg mockutil. It is also at https://sourceforge.net/projects/ibmtpm20tss/ as both a git repo and a tarball. Reproducible: Always
You need to read the packing docs, but this package is already in Fedora and was recently rebuilt by the maintainer. If you wish to co-maintain it please reach out to them.
Latest Fedora delivers 1.6.0. Ken's package shows 2.1.0 version. I think Ken reuse this bug report to work with Fedora's maintainer on uprade to 2.1.0.
Yes, Petr is right. I'd like to take over as the packager, but that process it unclear to me. It's my first time.
The easiest approach is to persuade a current maintainer to transfer the package ownership to you. If the current maintainer is not responding to you. E.g. to this request to upgrade the package, you can follow <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/> to taking the package from the current maintainer. A result will be an orphaned package any packager can take over. However, for both cases, the new maintainer needs to have a packager status. Technically it means he belongs to "packager" Fedora group. To become a packager, you need to follow <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/>.
Ken should already be a packager and a maintainer of the tss2 package. He is listed in the members of the package as an admin and is in the packager group. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tss2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/kgold/groups So, I think now all he has to do is follow the Package Maintenance Guide to make the changes. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Maintenance_Guide