Bug 2238593 - Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-community-runit - library wrapping runit service status
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-community-runit - library wrapping r...
Status: POST
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jerry James
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: 2239710 2210487
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2023-09-12 16:03 UTC by Mark E. Fuller
Modified: 2023-09-19 18:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
loganjerry: fedora-review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Jerry James 2023-09-13 19:52:35 UTC
I will take this review.  If you can take one on exchange and aren't scared of OCaml, I could use a review of bug 2238187.  If you don't want to touch an OCaml package, I understand. :-)

Fixing the bug name to have the package name in it.

Comment 2 Jerry James 2023-09-13 19:58:20 UTC
Looks good.  This package is APPROVED.

Package Review

[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

===== MUST items =====

[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "MIT License", "Unknown or
     generated". 12 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 170 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Checking: golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel-0.1.0-1.fc40.noarch.rpm
================================================ rpmlint session starts ================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpsf57p5o4')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

golang-github-prometheus-community-runit.spec: W: no-%build-section
golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/.goipath
golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/README.md /usr/share/doc/golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel/README.md
================= 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =================

Rpmlint (installed packages)
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
checks: 31, packages: 1

golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/.goipath
golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/README.md /usr/share/doc/golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel/README.md
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 

Source checksums
https://github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/archive/v0.1.0/go-runit-0.1.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 19f5a55b65d16a7450f78c8ba47212e4017b19af4ade5ff766f07dde7e024661
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 19f5a55b65d16a7450f78c8ba47212e4017b19af4ade5ff766f07dde7e024661

golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):


Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2238593 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Haskell, Ruby, PHP, Java, Ocaml, C/C++, Python, Perl, SugarActivity, R, fonts

Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-09-13 20:20:30 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-prometheus-community-runit

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.