Bug 2239258 - Review Request: reversal-icon-theme - Colorful icon theme inspired by Mac OS X aesthetic
Summary: Review Request: reversal-icon-theme - Colorful icon theme inspired by Mac OS ...
Keywords:
Status: ON_QA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Terje Rosten
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/yeyushengfan258/%{...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-09-16 17:27 UTC by Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
Modified: 2026-10-19 02:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
terjeros: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Package Review 2024-09-16 00:45:21 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 2 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2024-09-18 12:46:33 UTC
No new version released since; package is up to date.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-08-31 23:21:52 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9509761
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2239258-reversal-icon-theme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09509761-reversal-icon-theme/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file text-x-copying-symbolic.svg is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Terje Rosten 2026-10-18 10:04:09 UTC
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 329 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: reversal-icon-theme-0^20260317.git2c81222-1.fc46.noarch.rpm
          reversal-icon-theme-0^20260317.git2c81222-1.fc46.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpa_czrb4f')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

reversal-icon-theme.spec: W: no-%check-section
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/22/audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/22/kdenlive-hide-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-muted.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/22/kdenlive-show-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/audio.svg ../../status/24/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/kdenlive-hide-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-muted.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/kdenlive-show-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/player-volume-muted.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-muted.svg
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings, 655 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 6.2 s 

Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.10.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 33, packages: 1

reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/22/audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/22/kdenlive-hide-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-muted.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/22/kdenlive-show-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/audio.svg ../../status/24/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/kdenlive-hide-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-muted.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/kdenlive-show-audio.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-high.svg
reversal-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Reversal-dark/actions/24/player-volume-muted.svg ../../status/22/audio-volume-muted.svg
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings, 651 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 5.0 s 

Seems to be false finding

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/yeyushengfan258/Reversal-icon-theme/archive/2c8122287e3bad5a6bf860ddd8c7e3b78cf4d451/Reversal-icon-theme-2c8122287e3bad5a6bf860ddd8c7e3b78cf4d451.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 3053cef3034a424be0dc5a81a70550c6f9653e8839b1a1bdc13fbd19fb11c344
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3053cef3034a424be0dc5a81a70550c6f9653e8839b1a1bdc13fbd19fb11c344

Requires
--------
reversal-icon-theme (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    hicolor-icon-theme

Provides
--------
reversal-icon-theme:
    reversal-icon-theme


Issues:
 - don't use macro url:
   URL: https://github.com/yeyushengfan258/%{repo_name}


 the rest is fine, package is 

  APPROVED

Comment 7 Terje Rosten 2026-10-18 10:05:35 UTC
Other thing: Mac OS X is called macOS these days

Comment 8 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-10-18 10:16:11 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/reversal-icon-theme
Monitoring:
Wasn't able to create project in Anitya. You can create it manually on: `https://release-monitoring.org`

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2026-10-18 11:15:27 UTC
FEDORA-2026-77e6cade57 (reversal-icon-theme-0^20260317.git2c81222-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-77e6cade57

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2026-10-18 11:30:11 UTC
FEDORA-2026-9c905b8904 (reversal-icon-theme-0^20260317.git2c81222-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-9c905b8904

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2026-10-19 01:53:21 UTC
FEDORA-2026-77e6cade57 has been pushed to the Fedora 45 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-77e6cade57 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-77e6cade57

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2026-10-19 02:13:27 UTC
FEDORA-2026-9c905b8904 has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-9c905b8904 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-9c905b8904

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.