Bug 223992 - Warzone2100 - code not clean for x86_64
Warzone2100 - code not clean for x86_64
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: warzone2100 (Show other bugs)
9
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Karol Trzcionka
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
: 245540 335711 384321 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-23 09:58 EST by Karol Trzcionka
Modified: 2008-06-26 16:15 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-26 16:15:43 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Karol Trzcionka 2007-01-23 09:58:49 EST
The Warzone2100 is not prepare to build and work on x86_64. I contacted with
developers and the problem should be fixed in next version, but it will be
probably "in the last half of this year.". I will be checking the svn, but I
have not any access to x86_64 machine. 
The logs of building are here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145190
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145270
Comment 1 Francois Aucamp 2007-01-24 02:37:12 EST
Just for some clarification, the problem is basically the (old and infamous)
method of storing 64-bit pointers in 32-bit integers. However, since warzone2100
was originally a Windows-based application, it makes extensive use of DWORD,
UDWORD, etc, macros, which now only serves to obfuscate things even more.

Given the size of the source code, cleaning this up is a big(ish) task.
Comment 2 David Woodhouse 2007-06-25 06:10:41 EDT
*** Bug 245540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Karol Trzcionka 2007-10-17 10:49:08 EDT
*** Bug 335711 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Karol Trzcionka 2007-11-18 17:01:18 EST
*** Bug 384321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Michael Ploujnikov 2008-02-18 11:27:39 EST
I was able to compile the latest beta release in Fedora 8.
Info about the beta release:
http://forums.wz2100.net/?topic=1391.0
Source that I used to for compilation:
http://download.gna.org/warzone/releases/2.1/warzone2100-2.1_beta1.tar.bz2
Comment 6 Oliver Falk 2008-03-10 06:55:42 EDT
Great. Latest version in F-8 works (on alpha)!
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2008-04-22 14:52:44 EDT
warzone2100-2.1.0-0.5.beta2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2008-04-29 16:58:03 EDT
warzone2100-2.1.0-0.5.beta2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update warzone2100'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-3381
Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2008-05-13 22:33:59 EDT
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2008-05-17 18:22:01 EDT
warzone2100-2.1.0-0.5.beta2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.