Bug 2242987 - [rgw][indexless]: on Indexless placement, rgw daemon crashes with " ceph_assert(index.type == BucketIndexType::Normal)"
Summary: [rgw][indexless]: on Indexless placement, rgw daemon crashes with " ceph_asse...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 6.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.0
Assignee: J. Eric Ivancich
QA Contact: Madhavi Kasturi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2237662
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-10-10 04:31 UTC by Madhavi Kasturi
Modified: 2024-04-12 04:25 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.0-95.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Testing for reshardable bucket layouts is added to prevent crashes Previously, with the added bucket layout code to enable dynamic bucket resharding with multisite, there was no check to verify if the bucket layout supported resharding during dynamic, immediate, or rescheduled resharding. Due to this, the Ceph Object gateway daemon would crash in case of dynamic bucket resharding and the `radosgw-admin` command would crash in case of immediate or scheduled resharding. With this fix, a test for reshardable bucket layouts is added and the crashes no longer occur. When immediate and scheduled resharding occurs, an error message is displayed. When dynamic bucket resharding occurs, the bucket is skipped.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-12-13 15:24:23 UTC
Embargoed:
rpollack: needinfo-

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-7690 0 None None None 2023-10-10 04:31:58 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:7780 0 None None None 2023-12-13 15:24:27 UTC

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2023-12-13 15:24:23 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:7780
Comment 16 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-04-12 04:25:34 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.