Bug 2244820 - Review Request: xevd - Reference MPEG-5 Part 1 (EVC) decoder
Summary: Review Request: xevd - Reference MPEG-5 Part 1 (EVC) decoder
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Simone Caronni
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/mpeg5/xevd
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: MultimediaSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-10-18 12:46 UTC by Neal Gompa
Modified: 2025-05-11 17:01 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: xevd-0.5.0-2.fc43
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-05-11 17:01:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
negativo17: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6543577 to 8091459 (1.61 KB, patch)
2024-09-30 06:02 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Neal Gompa 2023-10-18 12:46:03 UTC
Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd.spec
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd-0.4.1-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
The eXtra-fast Essential Video Decoder (XEVD) is an
opensource and fast MPEG-5 EVC decoder.

MPEG-5 Essential Video Coding (EVC) is a video compression
standard of ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Grop (MPEG).
The main goal of the EVC is to provide a significantly
improved compression capability over existing video coding
standards with timely publication of terms.

EVC defines two profiles, including "Baseline Profile" and "Main Profile".

The "Baseline profile" contains only technologies that are older than
20 years or otherwise freely available for use in the standard.
In addition, the "Main profile" adds a small number of additional tools,
each of which can be either cleanly disabled or switched to the
corresponding baseline tool on an individual basis.

This package only includes the "Baseline profile".


Fedora Account System Username: ngompa

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-10-18 12:56:53 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6543577
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2244820-xevd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06543577-xevd/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2023-10-27 07:25:18 UTC
Requesting FE-Legal to review whether the stripping is sufficient.

Comment 3 Simone Caronni 2024-08-25 09:56:21 UTC
The line "Requires:       %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" at the top can be removed. It requires itself, and if the original intention was requiring the libraries, those are satisfied anyway by the automatic dependencies.

Comment 4 Simone Caronni 2024-09-29 13:22:24 UTC
@ngompa13 There's version 0.5.1 which contains your patches.

Comment 5 Neal Gompa 2024-09-29 16:02:45 UTC
Update to latest version (0.5.0):

Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd.spec
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd-0.5.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2024-09-29 16:03:45 UTC
Oops, wrong SRPM URL...

Update to latest version (0.5.0):

Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd.spec
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd-0.5.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-30 05:54:04 UTC
There seems to be some problem with the following file.
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/xevd-0.5.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
Fetching it results in a 404 Not Found error.
Please make sure the URL is correct and publicly available.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-30 06:02:01 UTC
Created attachment 2049473 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6543577 to 8091459

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-30 06:02:03 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8091459
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2244820-xevd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08091459-xevd/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 10 Simone Caronni 2024-12-31 09:38:55 UTC
Any update from FE-Legal?... it's almost 3 months now.

Comment 11 Neal Gompa 2025-03-24 17:34:56 UTC
Per discussion with mattdm, lifting FE-Legal.

Comment 12 Simone Caronni 2025-03-25 07:09:48 UTC
@ngompa13 what does it mean removing fedora-review? FE-Legal has blocked importing?

There are a few commits in master after 0.5.0, it seems the package can be compiled as well on ARM; it might be worth investigating.

Comment 13 Neal Gompa 2025-03-25 18:27:56 UTC
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #12)
> @ngompa13 what does it mean removing fedora-review? FE-Legal has
> blocked importing?
> 

The fedora-review tag was associated with ppisar, not you, so I removed it. You need to set it yourself.

> There are a few commits in master after 0.5.0, it seems the package can be
> compiled as well on ARM; it might be worth investigating.

I'll look into it later.

Comment 14 Simone Caronni 2025-03-26 12:55:38 UTC
Package approved.

Please fix the changelog before importing (or switch to autospec):

xevd.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.1-1 ['0.5.0-1.fc42', '0.5.0-1']

Thanks.

Comment 15 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-03-26 13:09:31 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xevd


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.