Some of the F39 RC1.2 images have "RC" in their name. Here are some examples: Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-39_RC-1.2.iso and also all the CHECKSUM and manifest files. On the other hand, Labs, Spins and Workstation files don't have "RC" in their ISOs (but have it in their CHECKSUMs). The RC is definitely not supposed to be there - we didn't have it in F38 and earlier. But I don't know whether it's an actual problem or not. Proposing for a blocker discussion. Note: Just renaming the ISO+other files is probably not feasible, because the compose metadata, checksums etc would then be broken.
Ugh. This is a pungi config failure. ;( I am going to fix it and fire a rc-1.3...
So, rc-1.3 failed. ;( We are discussing things in the go/no-go meeting before firing a rc-1.4.
Discussed at 2023-10-26 go/no-go meeting acting as a blocker review meeting - https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-10-26/ . Accepted as a blocker: we do not currently have a criterion for this, but there was strong agreement in principle at the meeting that there *should* be a criterion requiring Final release image names not to indicate in any way that they're not Final, and that the lack of this criterion was an oversight. So we agreed to add such a criterion and consider this bug to be in violation of it. We'll write up the criterion and add it to the wiki via the test@ mailing list this week.
Marking this MODIFIED just to indicate we believe we've fixed the config issue and RC-1.3 should be OK.
I've checked RC1.4 and haven't found "RC" anywhere. Looks good, closing.