Bug 224662 - e100 ethernet device has __tmp name instead of ethX
Summary: e100 ethernet device has __tmp name instead of ethX
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 224669
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: ia64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: fedora-ia64
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-26 21:48 UTC by Doug Chapman
Modified: 2011-12-20 15:50 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-26 22:37:38 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Doug Chapman 2007-01-26 21:48:43 UTC
Description of problem:

System is an HP rx2600 with 1 tg3 and 1 e100 device.  After a normal install of
rawhide-20070125 the e100 device has a __tmp name:


# ifconfig -a
__tmp440647619 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:6E:F3:AE:D8
          BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:6E:F3:1E:C5
          BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
          Interrupt:58


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rawhide-20070125
kernel-2.6.19-1.2913.fc7

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2007-01-26 22:07:46 UTC
Make sure that all ifcfg-* files have HWADDR in them.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2007-01-26 22:37:38 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 224669 ***

Comment 3 michael.steele 2011-01-11 15:46:00 UTC
 
Network interfaces named ___tmpxxxx when HWADDR is not specified
Article ID: 36572 - Created on: Nov 18, 2009 2:46 PM - Last Modified:  Dec 
15, 2010 9:55 AM 

Issue
Ethernet  interface keeps changing into  '__tmpxxxx'. 
When server is rebooted, interfaces are named as '__tmp' instead of ethx. 
Invalid network interface name after reboot

Environment
Red Hat Enterprise Linux  5.3 
initscripts-8.45.25-1.el5-x86_64

Resolution
To prevent this from occurring, the "HWADDR=" parameter should be used in 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethx as follows:

Ethernet Device
DEVICE=ethx
BOOTPROTO=static
HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx
ONBOOT=yes
Root Cause

What happens is:

1.	initrd loads modules. Generally not network ones, unless you've 
specifically configured it to do so. 

2.	udev loads modules. It loads them in parallel. This means that 
if you have multiple network drivers in the machine, they will race 
against each other for device assignment. 

3.	when a network device is created, /lib/udev/rename_device is run 
to attempt to coerce the device name into whatever device name is mapped 
to that MAC address in the ifcfg files. Otherwise, you just get the order 
they happen to initialize in (which can change from boot to boot) 

4.	rest of boot runs (during which you can do other things)
 
Due to the fact udev does not load modules sequentially (#2), you will get 
non-deterministic ethernet device ordering if you have multiple network 
drivers in the machine. It's inevitable. So, it is required to use HWADDR= 
in the ifcfg files  to accomplish that mapping. You could also use udev 
rules directly (with NAME=).

Comment 4 Roland 2011-08-24 08:22:08 UTC
I have the problem in RHEL 5.4 only when trying to use the interfaces of different adapters for bonding.

Based on

http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/s2-networkscripts-interfaces-chan.html

you may then not use HWADDR.

I configured bonding exactly as in link above.
After "service network restart" everything was fine.
After first reboot, still everything OK.
After secong reboot, problem occured.

Strange, isn't it?

Will really appriciate any help!

Comment 5 Robin R. Price II 2011-12-20 15:50:30 UTC
Roland,

Our documentation doesn't say you may not use HWADDR when setting up your slave devices.  These are just examples being shown.  Maybe we should update this page to include the HWADDR= but your slave devices should be fine having them.  Having HWADDR= in your bond is a different story.  You would want to, normally, leave this out as the bond will inherit one of the active slave mac addresses.

From the link you provided:

"For example, if two Ethernet interfaces are being channel bonded, both eth0 and eth1 _may_ look like the following example: "

I would put the HWADDR= into your slave configurations and try again.  Any problems, contact RH support or update this BZ.

~rp


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.