Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/polonium.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/polonium-1.0-0.1.20231029git2e4c5bd.fc39.src.rpm Description: An (unofficial) successor to Bismuth built on KWin 5.27. Features: - Actual tiling backend using binary trees and decent enough code where you can mod in your own - Edit tile sizes with the integrated KWin GUI - Move and tile windows with your mouse and keyboard - Set layouts independently of desktop X11 has been briefly tested but is not officially supported. If you encounter an issue running the script on X11, make sure it is reproducible in Wayland before submitting a bug report. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/polonium.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/polonium-1.0.0-0.1.20231029git2e4c5bd.fc39.src.rpm COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/polonium/build/6578520/ Fedora-Review: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eclipseo/polonium/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06578520-polonium/fedora-review/review.txt
Let's not package the dev version: Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/polonium.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/polonium-0.6.0-1.20231029git94ba0fa.fc39.src.rpm COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/polonium/build/6578553/ Fedora-Review: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eclipseo/polonium/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06578553-polonium/fedora-review/review.txt
Taking this review.
Why is the version-release "0.6.0-1.20231029git94ba0fa.fc39"? If it's a snapshot version, it should use standard versioning instead of the legacy one. Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_handling_non_sorting_versions_with_tilde_dot_and_caret
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6581578 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2246844-polonium/srpm-builds/06581578/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6581579 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2246844-polonium/srpm-builds/06581579/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6581888 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2246844-polonium/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06581888-polonium/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
> Why is the version-release "0.6.0-1.20231029git94ba0fa.fc39"? If it's a snapshot version, it should use standard versioning instead of the legacy one. This https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1073#request_diff Was never announced on devel or devel-announce according to search in my mailbox. How are we supposed to know if it is not announced, I don't check every common pages for changes. I don't even think forge macros are updated to reflect this.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.
This needs to be refreshed for KDE Plasma 6.