Bug 2247027 - setools fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_PyStack_AsDict’
Summary: setools fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of funct...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: setools
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Petr Lautrbach
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON3.13
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-10-30 12:26 UTC by Karolina Surma
Modified: 2023-10-31 17:08 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-10-31 17:08:52 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Karolina Surma 2023-10-30 12:26:06 UTC
setools fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1.

This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here with details.

setools/policyrep.c:5410:55: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_PyStack_AsDict’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
 5410 |     #define __Pyx_KwargsAsDict_FASTCALL(kw, kwvalues) _PyStack_AsDict(kwvalues, kw)
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html

For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06578856-setools/

For all our attempts to build setools with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/setools/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.

We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2023-10-31 17:03:56 UTC
This seems like Cython-generated code -- this could have been fixed in a followup Cython build. Will try a rebuild.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2023-10-31 17:08:52 UTC
Indeed. This package now builds fine with Python 3.13.0a1.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.