Bug 2248116 - [LC][Version]: Applying LC rule to delete expired current objects, does not generate delete-marker resulting in deletion of all the objects including non-current
Summary: [LC][Version]: Applying LC rule to delete expired current objects, does not g...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.0
Assignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat)
QA Contact: Chaithra
Rivka Pollack
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2237662
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-11-06 09:22 UTC by Chaithra
Modified: 2024-01-30 13:03 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-18.2.0-117.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Delete markers are working correctly with the LC rule Previously, optimization was attempted to reuse a sal object handle. Due to this, delete markers were not being generated as expected. With this fix, the change to re-use sal object handle for get-object-attributes is reverted and delete markers are created correctly.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-12-13 15:24:50 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 63458 0 None None None 2023-11-06 21:29:46 UTC
Github ceph ceph pull 54372 0 None open rgwlc: fix delete marker regression in currentversion lc expiration 2023-11-06 21:29:33 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-7859 0 None None None 2023-11-06 21:27:52 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:7780 0 None None None 2023-12-13 15:24:54 UTC

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2023-12-13 15:24:50 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 7.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:7780
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.