Bug 2248926 - Review Request: rust-jxl-oxide - JPEG XL decoder written in pure Rust
Summary: Review Request: rust-jxl-oxide - JPEG XL decoder written in pure Rust
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Fabio Valentini
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://crates.io/crates/jxl-oxide
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2248916 2248918 2248920 2248921 2248924 2248925
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-11-09 17:22 UTC by Kalev Lember
Modified: 2023-11-15 01:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-15 01:48:35 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
decathorpe: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6616692 to 6636777 (2.51 KB, patch)
2023-11-15 00:05 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Kalev Lember 2023-11-09 17:22:50 UTC
Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-jxl-oxide.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-jxl-oxide-0.3.0-1.fc40.src.rpm
Description:
JPEG XL decoder written in pure Rust.

Fedora Account System Username: kalev

Note that this package (and the rest of the jxl-oxide crates) aren't the latest upstream version because I've deliberately gone with the version that glycin-loaders expects for now.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-09 17:29:13 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6616692
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2248926-rust-jxl-oxide/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06616692-rust-jxl-oxide/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2023-11-13 22:33:02 UTC
Two requests for changes:

- Drop the "generate-fixtures" binary.

It appears to be used in the project's test suite, but the tests themselves are not shipped with this crate.
Adding `autobins = false` under the [package] table should do it.

This will make this a library-only crate, making the packaging simpler as well.

- Turn off the check %bcond.

All dev-dependencies are unused, since the test sources themselves are not shipped with the crate.

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2023-11-15 00:02:35 UTC
Thanks a lot for the review (and for the rest of the jxl stack!), Fabio!

I think your suggestions make a lot of sense -- I've updated the spec file.

* Tue Nov 14 2023 Kalev Lember <klember> - 0.3.0-3
- Disable check as all tests are excluded in the crate (rhbz#2248926)

* Tue Nov 14 2023 Kalev Lember <klember> - 0.3.0-2
- Drop unwanted "generate-fixtures" binary (rhbz#2248926)

Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-jxl-oxide.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-jxl-oxide-0.3.0-3.fc40.src.rpm

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-15 00:05:59 UTC
Created attachment 1999459 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6616692 to 6636777

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-15 00:06:01 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6636777
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2248926-rust-jxl-oxide/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06636777-rust-jxl-oxide/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fabio Valentini 2023-11-15 00:06:27 UTC
Thanks, looks good to me!

===

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass (test sources are not included in published tarballs)
! latest version of the crate is packaged (with explanation)
- license matches upstream specification (MIT OR Apache-2.0) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license files are included with %license in %files (temporarily manually included from upstream GitHub project)
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
  (should happen automatically)

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- track package in koschei for all built branches
  (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-11-15 01:02:05 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-jxl-oxide

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-11-15 01:46:14 UTC
FEDORA-2023-97fe0ade5c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-97fe0ade5c

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2023-11-15 01:48:35 UTC
FEDORA-2023-97fe0ade5c has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.