Spec URL: https://v02460.fedorapeople.org/golang-gopkg-macaroon-2.spec SRPM URL: https://v02460.fedorapeople.org/golang-gopkg-macaroon-2-2.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: A native Go implementation of macaroons Fedora Account System Username: v02460
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6662773 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2250314-golang-gopkg-macaroon-2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06662773-golang-gopkg-macaroon-2/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Spec URL: https://v02460.fedorapeople.org/golang-gopkg-macaroon2.spec SRPM URL: https://v02460.fedorapeople.org/golang-gopkg-macaroon2-2.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6677207 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2250314-golang-gopkg-macaroon2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06677207-golang-gopkg-macaroon2/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
I will take this review.
This package is APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License". 21 files have unknown license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 9499 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-gopkg-macaroon2-devel-2.1.0-1.fc41.noarch.rpm golang-gopkg-macaroon2-2.1.0-1.fc41.src.rpm ================================================ rpmlint session starts ================================================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpir06tztk')] checks: 32, packages: 2 golang-gopkg-macaroon2.src: W: strange-permission golang-gopkg-macaroon2.spec 600 golang-gopkg-macaroon2.spec: W: no-%build-section golang-gopkg-macaroon2-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/gopkg.in/macaroon.v2/.goipath =========== 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =========== Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 golang-gopkg-macaroon2-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/gopkg.in/macaroon.v2/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 3 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/go-macaroon/macaroon/archive/v2.1.0/macaroon-2.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : cb7f677a7ba287ce24c3523b4b3e121c0d64096fa72cc9adeaf813b1559ecc40 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cb7f677a7ba287ce24c3523b4b3e121c0d64096fa72cc9adeaf813b1559ecc40 Requires -------- golang-gopkg-macaroon2-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): go-filesystem golang(golang.org/x/crypto/nacl/secretbox) Provides -------- golang-gopkg-macaroon2-devel: golang(gopkg.in/macaroon.v2) golang-gopkg-macaroon2-devel golang-ipath(gopkg.in/macaroon.v2) Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/jamesjer/2250314-golang-gopkg-macaroon2/srpm/golang-gopkg-macaroon2.spec 2024-02-20 10:46:49.325919196 -0700 +++ /home/jamesjer/2250314-golang-gopkg-macaroon2/srpm-unpacked/golang-gopkg-macaroon2.spec 2023-11-21 17:00:00.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.3.5) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + # Generated by go2rpm 1.10.0 %bcond_without check @@ -49,3 +59,4 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +* Wed Nov 22 2023 Kai A. Hiller <V02460> - 2.1.0-1 +- Uncommitted changes Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2250314 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Haskell, Ocaml, Python, fonts, Ruby, Java, PHP, R, SugarActivity, C/C++, Perl Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gopkg-macaroon2
FEDORA-2024-6afd0e405d (golang-gopkg-macaroon2-2.1.0-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6afd0e405d
FEDORA-2024-6afd0e405d (golang-gopkg-macaroon2-2.1.0-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.