Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/medit/medit.spec
SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/medit/medit-0.8.1-1.src.rpm
Description: medit is a multiplatform GTK text editor. Started originally as a simple
built-in editor component in GGAP, it grew up to a real text editor
In fields %install,
in your "desktop-file-install" line commande, "--delete-original" was pasted
"--vendor=Fedora" is not required anymore, juste set --vendor="".
you shoudn't past all BuildRequires on the same line.
* must not include /usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache
* missing scriptlets for gtk-update-icon-cache (hicolor icons)
* must not include /usr/share/mime/mime.cache
* contents of /usr/share/mime/ and subdirs are highly questionable
and need a very close look
- Fix desktop-file
- Add post and postun section about gtk-update-icon-cache and mimeinfo
- Fix files section
New Spec : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/medit/medit.spec
New SRPM : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/medit/medit-0.8.1-2.src.rpm
You should probably look at these
E: medit only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: medit standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons
E: medit non-executable-script /usr/lib/moo/plugins/lib/pyconsole.py 0644
E: medit zero-length /usr/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
E: medit zero-length /usr/share/mime/aliases
E: medit zero-length /usr/lib/moo/plugins/project/mprj/test.py
E: medit non-executable-script /usr/share/moo/language-specs/check.sh 0644
(In reply to comment #1)
> "--vendor=Fedora" is not required anymore, juste set --vendor="".
you should probably take note of this as well
what's the difference between mooedit and medit ???
> contents of /usr/share/mime/ and subdirs are highly
> questionable and need a very close look
Please do investigate as why your package includes files which
belong elsewhere or are generated at run-time:
Also on your system, these files do exist already.
When I try to install medit-0.8.1-2.i386 I get:
file /usr/share/mime/globs from install of medit-0.8.1-2 conflicts with
file from package monodevelop-0.12-7.fc6
That is also a packaging bug in monodevelop then, as the file must
not be included.
It's nearly two months now, since my last ping.
I'll be closing this bug as WONTFIX, if I hear no news from DamienDurand till
15 June 2007.
PS: fedora contributors who are away for a long time should fill up their
absence in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation