This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2017-10-23 It is expected to last about 30 minutes
Bug 225118 - Review Request: pyopengl - Standard OpenGL bindings for Python
Review Request: pyopengl - Standard OpenGL bindings for Python
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-28 22:37 EST by Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-27 07:49:36 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-01-28 22:37:43 EST
Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/pyopengl.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/PyOpenGL-3.0.0a5-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
Description: Standard OpenGL bindings for Python

rpmlint output on binary (source is silent - only one kind of error)
W: PyOpenGL incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.0.0a5-1 3.0.0a5-1.kwizart.fc6
E: PyOpenGL zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/Demo/readme.txt
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/tests/test_tess1.py 0644
E: PyOpenGL wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/Demo/NeHe/lesson4.py ""
E: PyOpenGL script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/Demo/GLUT/tom/conechecker.py

Should I add the shebang to /usr/bin/python ?
Comment 1 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-01-28 22:43:11 EST
I Also need to be sponsored...
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-01-28 22:54:21 EST
Please contact with bug 221031
Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2007-03-27 07:34:39 EDT
Since Nicolas has been requested to discuss this further in bug 221031, and has
not done so for 2 months! I Suggest we close this bug, and further discuss this
in bug 221031
Comment 4 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2007-03-27 07:49:36 EDT
Fine for me... i will see your version...
Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2007-03-27 07:54:35 EDT
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fine for me... i will see your version...
> 

Wow that was quick, I hope I didn't offend you in anyway, its just that I'm used
to closing reviews when the submitter doesn't responds to request for a long
while, as this not responding usually is a reoccuring problem.

If you're interested you can take a look at my version (and give feedback) here:
bug 234121

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.