Bug 2253580 - Review Request: libayatana-indicator - Ayatana Indicators Shared Library
Summary: Review Request: libayatana-indicator - Ayatana Indicators Shared Library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sergio Basto
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/AyatanaIndicators/...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2253579 2265817
Blocks: 1651349 2253582
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-12-08 00:04 UTC by Arthur Bols
Modified: 2024-02-25 22:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-02-25 21:34:47 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
sergio: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Arthur Bols 2023-12-08 00:04:39 UTC
Spec URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/libayatana-indicator.spec
SRPM URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: The Ayatana Indicators library contains information to build indicators
to go into modern desktops' indicator applets.
Fedora Account System Username: principis

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-08 00:07:08 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6732795
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2253580-libayatana-indicator/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06732795-libayatana-indicator/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-02-24 22:30:26 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7057696
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2253580-libayatana-indicator/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07057696-libayatana-indicator/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Sergio Basto 2024-02-25 16:28:19 UTC
I reviewed libayatana-indicator.spec is also good and it doesn't override the old libappindicator. We just need to check if it builds with libayatana-ido3-0.4 and dbus-test-runner to approve for that we need build  dbus-test-runner  on rawhide and enable tests in this package

Comment 5 Arthur Bols 2024-02-25 17:07:25 UTC
Tests work in mock, so re-enabled them.


Spec URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/libayatana-indicator.spec
SRPM URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc39.src.rpm

Comment 6 Sergio Basto 2024-02-25 19:05:56 UTC
(In reply to Arthur Bols from comment #5)
> Tests work in mock, so re-enabled them.
> 
> 
> Spec URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/libayatana-indicator.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://principis.fedorapeople.org/libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc39.src.rpm

where is mock build ? can you enable in copr settings "[] Run fedora-review tool for packages in this project" 

fedora-review-service is down since yesterday ...

Comment 7 Arthur Bols 2024-02-25 20:06:44 UTC
(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #6)
> where is mock build ? can you enable in copr settings "[] Run fedora-review
> tool for packages in this project" 
> 
> fedora-review-service is down since yesterday ...

I rebuild it in copr with fedora-review option enabled: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/principis/ayatana-indicator-libs/build/7059245/ .

fedora-review seems broken on rawhide, but you can use the f39 one.

Comment 8 Sergio Basto 2024-02-25 20:56:11 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
     Note: Sources not installed
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[ ]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
     3". 49 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/libayatana-indicator/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 6340 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     libayatana-indicator-gtk2 , libayatana-indicator-gtk3 , libayatana-
     indicator-gtk2-devel , libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel , libayatana-
     indicator-tools-gtk3
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[ ]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define _vpath_builddir build-
     gtk3, %define _vpath_builddir build-gtk2, %define _vpath_builddir
     build-gtk3, %define _vpath_builddir build-gtk2, %define
     _vpath_builddir build-gtk3, %define _vpath_builddir build-gtk2
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: libayatana-indicator-gtk2-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-gtk3-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-debugsource-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc39.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp8wa5tykk')]
checks: 32, packages: 8

libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/libayatana-indicator/ayatana-indicator-loader3
libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-missing-lib
libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel package contains libraries and header files for
libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel package contains libraries and header files for
 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings, 57 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 0.9 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: libayatana-indicator-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-gtk3-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          libayatana-indicator-gtk2-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpsoynaa64')]
checks: 32, packages: 3

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 17 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-gtk3-debuginfo".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-debugsource".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-gtk3".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-gtk2".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-gtk2-debuginfo".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-debuginfo".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel".
There are no files to process nor additional arguments.
Nothing to do, aborting.
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 9

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/AyatanaIndicators/libayatana-indicator/archive/0.9.4/libayatana-indicator-0.9.4.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : a18d3c682e29afd77db24366f8475b26bda22b0e16ff569a2ec71cd6eb4eac95
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a18d3c682e29afd77db24366f8475b26bda22b0e16ff569a2ec71cd6eb4eac95


Requires
--------
libayatana-indicator-gtk2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libayatana-indicator-gtk3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libayatana-ido3-0.4.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libayatana-indicator-gtk2(x86-64)
    libayatana-indicator.so.7()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0)

libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libayatana-indicator-gtk3(x86-64)
    libayatana-indicator3.so.7()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
    pkgconfig(libayatana-ido3-0.4)

libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libayatana-indicator-gtk3(x86-64)

libayatana-indicator-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

libayatana-indicator-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
libayatana-indicator-gtk2:
    libayatana-indicator-gtk2
    libayatana-indicator-gtk2(x86-64)
    libayatana-indicator.so.7()(64bit)

libayatana-indicator-gtk3:
    libayatana-indicator-gtk3
    libayatana-indicator-gtk3(x86-64)
    libayatana-indicator3.so.7()(64bit)

libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel:
    libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel
    libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(ayatana-indicator-0.4)

libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel:
    libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel
    libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(ayatana-indicator3-0.4)

libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3:
    libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3
    libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3(x86-64)

libayatana-indicator-debuginfo:
    libayatana-indicator-debuginfo
    libayatana-indicator-debuginfo(x86-64)

libayatana-indicator-debugsource:
    libayatana-indicator-debugsource
    libayatana-indicator-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name libayatana-indicator --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-39-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, Java, PHP, Python, R, Perl
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH


Nothing to point , it builds well with tests enabled 

Package APPROVED

Comment 9 Arthur Bols 2024-02-25 21:10:02 UTC
Thank you for the review!

Comment 10 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-02-25 21:10:38 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libayatana-indicator

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2024-02-25 21:28:28 UTC
FEDORA-2024-80f9f5cf80 (libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-80f9f5cf80

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2024-02-25 21:34:47 UTC
FEDORA-2024-80f9f5cf80 (libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2024-02-25 21:38:34 UTC
FEDORA-2024-ec91cb74e2 (libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-ec91cb74e2

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2024-02-25 21:46:34 UTC
FEDORA-2024-ec91cb74e2 (libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2024-02-25 22:35:16 UTC
FEDORA-2024-00f0a54533 (libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-00f0a54533


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.