Bug 2254289 - Review Request: ktimetracker - Track time spent on various tasks
Summary: Review Request: ktimetracker - Track time spent on various tasks
Keywords:
Status: POST
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://invent.kde.org/pim/%{name}
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-12-13 05:57 UTC by Justin Zobel
Modified: 2023-12-13 23:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Justin Zobel 2023-12-13 05:57:09 UTC
Spec URL: https://justinz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ktimetracker/ktimetracker.spec
SRPM URL: https://justinz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ktimetracker/ktimetracker-5.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm

Description:
KTimeTracker tracks time spent on various tasks. It is useful for tracking hours to be billed to different clients or just to find out what percentage of your day is spent playing Doom or reading Slashdot.


Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110265937

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-13 06:10:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6747501
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2254289-ktimetracker/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06747501-ktimetracker/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Not a valid SPDX expression 'GFDL-1.2-only AND LGPLv3 and GPL-2.0-only'.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2023-12-13 23:46:04 UTC
Review notes:

* Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines
* Package builds and installs
* Package licensing is correctly handled
* No serious issues from rpmlint

PACKAGE APPROVED.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.