Spec URL: https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core.spec SRPM URL: https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core-1.3.3-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: Arbitrary-precision unit-aware calculator. Fedora Account System Username: albertlarsan68
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6765362 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2254883-rust-fend-core/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06765362-rust-fend-core/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Do you specifically need 1.3.x for something? Otherwise, 1.4.1 just came out and 1.4.x was first release several weeks ago
I do not need 1.3.x, it is just because 1.3.3 was the latest version when I made the package. Should I post new SRPM & Specs with the 1.4.x version?
Yes please - if there's no reason you need the old version, do update with the latest. If it had been just a patch release I'd review now and ask you to update before importing, but since it's a minor release, might as well do it before continuing the review.
Spec URL: https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core.spec SRPM URL: https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core-1.4.1-1.fc40.src.rpm Updated!
Created attachment 2007881 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 6765362 to 6875367
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6875367 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2254883-rust-fend-core/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06875367-rust-fend-core/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
This mostly looks fine, except... upstream does not ship the license file in the crate (sorry for not catching that earlier!). This is a common issue where upstream has one repo hosting multiple crates, I suggest the following: - send one PR to https://github.com/printfn/fend symlinking the license file and any other relevant files to the individual crate directories. I normally use `cargo package --allow-dirty --no-verify` followed by `tar tf .. | grep LICENSE` to demonstrate the license files get picked up - put the PR as a comment above a new Source: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/printfn/fend/main/LICENSE.md line - in %prep, `cp -p %{SOURCE1} .` to copy in the license file - in %files devel, replace #FIXME with %license %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE.md
Spec URL: https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core.spec SRPM URL: https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core-1.4.1-1.fc40.src.rpm PR is https://github.com/printfn/fend/pull/260, and the package builds and installs.
Created attachment 2008241 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 6875367 to 6881622
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6881622 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2254883-rust-fend-core/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06881622-rust-fend-core/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. - package builds and installs without errors on rawhide - test suite is run and all unit tests pass - latest version of the crate is packaged - license matches upstream specification (GPL-3.0-or-later) and is acceptable for Fedora - [BINARY ONLY] licenses of statically linked dependencies are correctly taken into account - license file is included with %license in %files - package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks (use `fedora-sig-onboard onboard rust-$crate` to automate): - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer (should happen automatically) - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - track package in koschei for all built branches (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-fend-core
FEDORA-2024-68964eed86 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-68964eed86
FEDORA-2024-68964eed86 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.