Bug 2255219 - UI re-installation of external mode in multi storagecluster fails because the namespace exists
Summary: UI re-installation of external mode in multi storagecluster fails because the...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: management-console
Version: 4.15
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.15.0
Assignee: Sanjal Katiyar
QA Contact: Shay Rozen
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-12-19 10:58 UTC by Shay Rozen
Modified: 2024-07-18 04:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.15.0-112
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-03-19 15:25:49 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage odf-console pull 1142 0 None open support cluster creation even if namespace already exists 2023-12-27 10:12:43 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-console pull 1165 0 None open Bug 2255219: [release-4.15] support cluster creation even if namespace already exists 2024-01-09 15:44:53 UTC
Github red-hat-storage odf-console pull 1166 0 None open Bug 2255219: [release-4.15-compatibility] support cluster creation even if namespace already exists 2024-01-09 15:45:08 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:1383 0 None None None 2024-03-19 15:25:52 UTC

Description Shay Rozen 2023-12-19 10:58:31 UTC
Created attachment 2004975 [details]
image of the error

Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
When re-installing external mode in multistoragecluster environment, UI installation fails because the namespace exists (openshift-storage-extended). Internal mode re-installation do support existing namespace when re-installing.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
odf 4.15.0-88


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
No

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
Delete the namespace manually 

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?
2

Can this issue reproducible?
yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
yes

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:
No

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install ODF internal mode.
2. Add an external storagesystem.
3. Delete the external storagesystem
4. Try to re-install the external storagesystem.

Actual results:
Re-installation fails with "namespaces "openshift-storage-extended" already exists"

Expected results:
The installation need to support installation even if namespace exists. Internal mode re-installation knows how to handle an existing namespace.


Additional info:

Comment 5 Sanjal Katiyar 2024-01-11 08:57:45 UTC
RDT not needed... it is 4.15 feature...

Comment 7 Shay Rozen 2024-03-05 13:36:29 UTC
UI still stating when trying to add external storagesystem:
namespaces "openshift-storage-extended" already exists
Moving to post
4.15-155

Comment 8 Sanjal Katiyar 2024-03-05 13:56:56 UTC
I am moving it back to MODIFIED (for time being), I doubt that we still have same issue as before, please check video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P60QSPmvZpxfQspAjX01eQ14Yg3JBJ9s/view?usp=sharing for reference.

Shay, can you please attach the screenshot or recording of error ?

Comment 10 Shay Rozen 2024-03-07 07:30:42 UTC
Don't know how yesterday I've got the following in UI:

namespaces "openshift-storage-extended" already exists

Tested it today with same cluster twice and there is no problem. Moving to verified.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2024-03-19 15:25:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-07-18 04:25:15 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.