Please branch and build rdfind in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain rdfind in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rdfind/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
Needed to keep linux-firmware in CentOS Hyperscale SIG in sync with linux-firmware in Rawhide, that recently added a dependency on rdfind - thanks! (The goal to minimize firmware size is exactly why we brought Fedora's linux-firmware to Hyperscale in the first place)
Will you be able to branch and build rdfind in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package if you do not to build it on epel9. I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma).
(In reply to Michel Lind from comment #1) > Needed to keep linux-firmware in CentOS Hyperscale SIG in sync with > linux-firmware in Rawhide, that recently added a dependency on rdfind - > thanks! > > (The goal to minimize firmware size is exactly why we brought Fedora's > linux-firmware to Hyperscale in the first place) With linux-firmware being in the main centos distro this would need to be in centos proper not in EPEL9, I don't wish to do that work only to have it pulled into c9s proper. It doesn't make sense to have this in epel when it's needed in the main distro for the compose.
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > (In reply to Michel Lind from comment #1) > > Needed to keep linux-firmware in CentOS Hyperscale SIG in sync with > > linux-firmware in Rawhide, that recently added a dependency on rdfind - > > thanks! > > > > (The goal to minimize firmware size is exactly why we brought Fedora's > > linux-firmware to Hyperscale in the first place) > > With linux-firmware being in the main centos distro this would need to be in > centos proper not in EPEL9, I don't wish to do that work only to have it > pulled into c9s proper. It doesn't make sense to have this in epel when it's > needed in the main distro for the compose. that's a good point, at some point this might end up in CentOS proper anyway. Let me ask for a git.centos.org repo then (SIG builds are still in git.centos instead of in gitlab, sigh). Thanks!
https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/1337