Bug 225619 - Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Gwyn Ciesla
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-01-31 12:46 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2011-06-17 11:49 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2011-06-17 11:49:00 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
limburgher: fedora‑review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 12:46:12 EST
Fedora Merge Review: bluez-hcidump

Initial Owner: dwmw2@redhat.com
Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-02-06 12:19:57 EST
all rpmlint clean, save:

bluez-hcidump.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/bluez-hcidump-1.40/NEWS

Not a problem.  Could drop that file.

Source tag should be like:


Either way, though, the upstream is 404.  Might be a problem on upstream's end.

Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers.  Any ETA on upgrading to 1.41?
Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-05-16 11:04:08 EDT
Any updates?
Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-09-09 09:18:34 EDT
Re-evaluated new rahide SRPM, no changes from above mustfixes.

Added current pkg owner to CC.
Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2008-12-09 14:53:53 EST
Any objection to my committing fixes to CVS and closing?
Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-03-31 10:47:06 EDT
I see we're at 1.42 now.

Now I can grab it with the URL in the spec but not the URL I suggested.  Nor can I browse the pacakges on sf.net.  Definitely a SF issue.
Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2010-04-29 16:11:38 EDT
Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-03-31 12:39:32 EDT
Now at 2.0. . .
Comment 8 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-06-17 11:49:00 EDT
Retrying on 2.0-2.

rpmlint clean except for spelling errors and zero-length NEWS.  You could remove that, but it's not critical.

Otherwise it's good, the Source URL is good now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.